Colts

colt: a young male animal of the horse family; a male horse of not more than four years of age. Posts in this category pertain to the National Football League (NFL) American Football Conference (AFC) South division team, the Indianapolis Colts.

Anthony Costanzo, LT, Boston College

2011 NFL Draft – Colts Round 1

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL
Anthony Costanzo, LT, Boston College

Anthony Costanzo, LT, Boston College

With the 22nd overall pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Anthony Costanzo, LT, Boston College

Stats:

  • HT: 6'7 / WT: 311 / 40: 5.23

Overview:

After a surprising number of teams selected quarterbacks in the first round, Costanzo became the "Best Player Available'", falling to the Colts at the #22 pick. Costanzo, rated by many as one of the top 2 or 3 left tackles in this year's draft, appears ready to step into a starting role as an NFL left tackle, which would fill a glaring upgrade need for the Colts. Costanzo is clearly a value pick, and may prove to be a steal.

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The selection of Castonzo shows that Bill Polian was serious about upgrading the protection of Peyton Manning. The Boston College star enters the league with a ton of experience and is one of the most technically sound players at the position. He gives the Colts a potential starter as a left or right tackle and some flexibility in configuring a rebuilt offensive line.

  • Yahoo Sports

    The Colts' offensive line faltered last season and made Peyton Manning's job as challenging as ever. Castonzo can plug in at left tackle and protect Manning's blind side from Day 1. He's a smart, versatile, technically sound pass protector who could stand to improve his core base strength.

  • ESPN

    What he brings: A smart, instinctive and polished player, Castonzo has the technique and maturity to step in and play right away. His lateral mobility is just average but he does a good job sinking his hips and using his hands when he can get into position. He's not a road-grader as a run blocker but does a good job getting on the edge and covering defenders to create running lanes, which works well with Indy's zone blocking scheme.

    How he fits: Offensive tackle may have been the No. 1 need and he is an excellent fit as an intelligent player in a very sophisticated offense. Even though the Colts get a lot of publicity for not giving up a lot of sacks, much of it is due to Peyton Manning's quick release and not their pass protection.

  • Fox Sports

    Castonzo could be an immediate starter and he showed a lot of versatility by playing three different offensive line positions at the Senior Bowl. This is a smart kid and the Colts definitely have an need on the offensive line.

    The Colts were very lucky to be able to select the talented Castonzo because he was projected to go off the board much earlier in the first round. He’ll be expected to start as a rookie at left tackle.

Scouting Reports

  • Draft Board Insider (Rank: #14 Overall / #3 OT)

    Castonzo is a very smart player with very good awareness and instincts. He's a very sound technical blocker and while he isn't always the most athletic or powerful guy on the field, rarely is he caught out of position or beat on a play because he didn't do his job or follow his assignment. In terms of a resume' you can't discount a guy who's a four year starter at both left and right tackle.

  • NFL.com (Grade: 8.0)

    Strengths: Castonzo possesses ideal height for the tackle position and has great feet. A highly-productive and extremely durable performer with over 50 starts in his college career. Smart, tough player and a hard worker. Huge, long frame coupled with impressive mobility allows him to shut down speed rushers. Puts himself in good position while run blocking. Comfortable and productive in space.

    Weaknesses:: Must improve his bulk and playing strength (both upper and lower body). Can be beat by a strong bull rush or violent pass rushing moves. Can get caught dipping his head in pass protection. Does not push people off the line of scrimmage in the running game.

  • SI.com (Grade: 3.05 - First-Year Contributor)

    Positives: Tall, relatively athletic tackle prospect who comes with a high upside. Keeps his feet moving throughout the action, displays better than average footwork off the edge, and is effective in pass protection. Moves well about the field, easily slides out, and fights hard to finish blocks. Adjusts to defenders, blocks with good lean, and easily holds the point. Shows good quickness, stays square, and is an effective position blocker who seals opponents from the action. Turns defenders off the line run blocking and uses his long arms to push opponents from their angle of attack. Makes good use of angles, keeps his head on a swivel, and works well with teammates.

    Negatives: Just average blocking in motion. Must improve his blocking balance. Overextends into blocks, adversely affecting his ability to finish the play.

    Analysis: Castonzo has been a terrific tackle on the college level and offers the size, athleticism, and blocking fundamentals to eventually start at the next level. He should be given a chance at the all-important left tackle position before any consideration is given to moving him to the right side.

  • Mocking The Draft (Rank: #4 OT)

    Castonzo is much better as a pass blocker than run blocker at this point of his development. He can use his natural abilities – agility, quickness, length – to his advantage to wall off defenders. Does really well moving his hands in and out to knock defenders back. Possesses a wide, smooth kick slide to the outside. Castonzo is quick enough to work his power slide to stop inside rushers. Will get fooled at times by stunting defenders.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 6.9 - B - Dirty Starting Caliber)

    The size, length and natural athleticism is there, but he needs more time to mature physically. I don't think he's a guy who you can pencil in as a starter on the left side from day one, but with some time he has the skill set to eventually develop into a serviceable starting left tackle in the NFL. However, as of now, isn't an elite offensive tackle prospect by any stretch in my book.

  • Draft Countdown (Rating: 4 Stars / Projection: 1st Round)

    Strengths: Ideal size with a large frame, long arms and big hands, Very good athleticism, quickness, agility and balance, Shows relatively nimble feet to slide laterally and mirror, Displays the ability to recover and adjust in action, Effective run blocker who generates sufficient movement, Polished technician who understands positioning / angles, Able to stun with initial punch and uses hands well overall, Mobile with range to work in space and get to second level, Extraordinarily smart with great instincts and awareness, Competitive, aggressive and active with a terrific motor, Mature and a fiery leader with an outstanding work ethic, Durable with a ton of experience against top competition

    Weaknesses: Still developing in terms of weight / strength, Is not overly stout at the point of attack, Narrow base and struggles to anchor / sustain, Isn't a powerful, road grading run blocker, Can be inconsistent with knee bend / leverage, Had some trouble with elite speed off the edge

  • Fox Sports

    Scouts love his feel for the game and smarts, qualities that are no surprise since he was a Rhodes Scholar nominee as a biochemistry major. Castonzo is also considered very disciplined, perhaps from his time playing football at Fork Union Military Academy in Virginia. He rates high in athleticism, size and versatility since he can fit in well at either tackle slot. Castonzo is a solid bet to be drafted in the top 15 and could be the top offensive lineman taken.

  • FFToolbox (Rank: #19 in Top 100)

    At 6-7 and 308 pounds Castonzo certainly has the size to play in the NFL. He could have left a year early, but the extra year at Boston College saw him add quite a bit of needed weight. The pundits have already been paying close attention to Castonzo since he was on the radar last year and his year bulking up at BC should move him up into the late first round or the second round.

  • WalterFootball (Rank: #2 OT / Projection: Top 20)

    Castonzo uses finesse and technique to his advantage. His upside is in adding a few pounds and more strength. This would make him a better run blocker and more able to slow down powerful NFL rushers.

  • NFL Draft Geek (Rank: #5 OT / Tier: 2)

    He does a good job walling his defender off, blocking into the second level, and opening up holes for the back to run through. He has great height and long arms, and uses his arms well to guide his defender where he wants them to go when run blocking. His pass protection is a real cause for concern from me though, he is not very agile, he plays way too high, which allows defenders to get underneath him, and he is not very strong as of now.

Colts 2010 Draft Recap

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

Overall

In the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts addressed needs regarding depth and the eventual replacement of some aging players. In the first round, the Colts added a third pass-rushing DE to replace the departed Raheem Brock and who may prove to be Dwight Freeney's eventual replacement.  In the second round, the Colts added depth at MLB, with a player who may prove to be Gary Brackett's eventual replacement. In the third round, the Colts added depth at CB to replace the departed Marlin Jackson and Tim Jennings. In rounds four and five, the Colts added run-blocking depth for the offensive line, with an OG and a TE. In the seventh round, the Colts added special-teams depth/developmental prospects at DT and OLB, as well as a potential kick-return specialist/WR/CB/special-teamer.

The first-round pick is a DE in the mold - if not a carbon-copy - of Freeney and Mathis, and was considered to be potentially the best pass-rusher in the draft. The second-round pick is a MLB in the mold of Gary Brackett, and in the Colts' developmental system he should have a year or two as Brackett's understudy. The third-round pick is a CB in the mold of Marlin Jackson and Kelvin Hayden, and should provide an immediate upgrade to the Colts' dime package (along with Hayden, Jerraud Powers, and Jacob Lacey). The fourth-round pick is a depth/developmental prospect as a run-blocking OG. The fifth-round pick is a TE who specializes in run-blocking, and is considered to be perhaps the best run-blocking TE in the draft.

The 2010 draft crop of Offensive Tackles was deep in bodies, but shallow in talent. Thus, the Colts opted not to reach for talent at the one position for which the Colts have a primary need for upgrade. However, the problem with the Colts' 2009 Offensive Line was not at Left Tackle, but rather run-blocking, primarily to the right. The Colts apparently believe their 2010 starting LT is already on the roster, choosing to use their draft picks for rotational depth and developmental prospects.

Given that the Colts have no glaring weaknesses (aside, perhaps, from the OL run blocking, and kick returner - which the team considers to be a "luxury" position), that they lost the Super Bowl last season primarily due to injuries to DE and CB that prevented the defense from stopping the New Orleans offense in the second half, and that the starters in the two critical positions in the Colts' defensive scheme - DE and MLB - are beginning to age, the Colts' draft strategy makes good sense.

Round 1

Summary

Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU

Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU

Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU

Stats:

  • HT: 6'2 / WT: 255 / 40:4.69
  • Career: 139 tackles, 28.5 sacks, 39 TFL, 7 FF, 2 INT
  • 2008/2009 First-Team All-American, 2009 Lott Trophy (Defensive IMPACT player) Winner, 2009 Hendricks Award (Top Defensive End) winner

Overview:

Hughes is a "tweener" pass-rushing DE in the mold of Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis. He is considered to be the best pass-rusher in the draft, and is known for his speed, tenacity, motor, and football intelligence. Many projected Hughes as a Round 2/3 pick who would move to OLB in a 3-4 defense, due to his lack of size at DE (or, in other words: exactly what the experts predicted for Freeney).

Round 2

Summary

Pat Angerer, MLB, Iowa

Pat Angerer, MLB, Iowa

Pat Angerer, MLB, Iowa

Stats:

  • HT: 6'0 / WT: 235 / 40: 4.69
  • Career: 2009 - 135 tackles, 4 TFL
  • 2009 First-Team All American, 2009 Second-Team All American, 2009 First-Team All Big-Ten

Overview:

Most draft analysts projected Angerer to be a mid-round prospect and a solid contributor and eventual starter at ILB. Angerer is a solid-tackling ball hawk who contains well. Excellent run defender and shows speed in covering the field. That the Colts took Angerer in the second round perhaps indicates that the team thinks he has the potential to be groomed as Gary Brackett's eventual replacement.

Round 3

Summary

Kevin Thomas, CB, USC

Kevin Thomas, CB, USC

Kevin Thomas, CB, USC

Stats:

  • HT: 6'0 / WT: 192 / 40: 4.48
  • Career: 1-year starter at USC, 57 tackles, 11 PD
  • 2009 Second-Team All PAC-10

Overview:

Thomas is a quick, physical, if inexperienced, cornerback. His height and weight are reminiscent more of Marlin Jackson and Kelvin Hayden than the shorter/smaller Jerraud Powers, Jacob Lacey, or Tim Jennings. The Colts had a definite need for depth at CB (see: Tim Jennings in the Super Bowl), and have shown the ability to coach up inexperienced players (see: Powers and Lacey). Thomas provides an upgrade and depth as a dime- (or perhaps even nickel-) back.

Round 4

Summary

Jacques McClendon, OG, Tenn

Jacques McClendon, OG, Tenn

Jacques McClendon, OG, Tenn

Stats:

  • HT: 6'2 / WT: 325 / 40: SPD
  • Career: Stats N/A

Overview:

McClendon is a big, run-blocking beast of an OG. Projected as a likely undrafted free agent, some consider McClendon to be a reach for the Colts in the fourth round. However, the Colts generally select OL in the mid-rounds of the draft, and tend to select "project" picks who can be developed in the Colts' system. McClendon fits that mold, and continues an apparent trend of increasing size on the offensive line.

Round 5

Summary

Brody Eldridge, TE, Oklahoma

Brody Eldridge, TE, Oklahoma

Brody Eldridge, TE, Oklahoma

Stats:

  • HT: 6'5 / WT: 261 / 40: 4.85
  • Career: Started at TE, OG, C
  • 2009 Second-Team All Big-12

Overview:

Eldridge is a versatile player on the offensive line, having played Center, Guard, and Tight End; but his primary strength is as a run-blocking Tight End. Eldridge is considered by many as one of, if not the, best run-blocking Tight Ends in the draft. It is highly likely that the Colts drafted Eldridge for precisely that role, as he would be an incredibly small OG, even by previous Colts' standards.

Round 6

(The Colts had no picks in Round 6.)

Round 7

Summary

Ricardo Mathews, DT, Cincinnati

Ricardo Matthews, DT, Cincinnati

Ricardo Mathews, DT, Cincinnati

Stats:

  • HT: 6'3 / WT: 294 / 40: 4.98

Overview:

Mathews is a developmental prospect for the Colts' interior defensive line. His propensity as a run stuffer likely indicates that he will remain at DT, although based on his size Mathews fits the DT/DE "tweener" mold. Adds depth to a generally solid defensive tackle rotation.

Kavell Conner, LB, Clemson

Kavell Conner, LB, Clemson

Kavell Conner, LB, Clemson

Stats:

  • HT: 6'0 / WT: 242 / 40: 4.63

Overview:

Conner is a developmental prospect at WIL for the Colts. His speed and range suit him well for the weakside LB position in the Colts' system. Adds rotational depth to the LB corps and, as a compensatory pick, comes at a very good value for the Colts. Likely special-teams depth in his first year or two.

Ray Fisher, DB, Indiana

Ray Fisher, DB, Indiana

Ray Fisher, DB, Indiana

Stats:

  • HT: 5'9 / WT: 185 / 40: 4.45

Overview:

Fisher was a KR/PR specialist in college who played WR his first three seasons, then switched to CB in his senior season. Likely drafted by the Colts as a potential kick returner, Fisher is a special-teams player who adds potential depth at both CB and WR.

2010 NFL Draft – Colts: Round 7

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

With the 238th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Ricardo Matthews, DT, Cincinnati

Ricardo Mathews, DT, Cincinnati

Ricardo Mathews, DT, Cincinnati

Stats:

  • HT: 6'3 / WT: 294 / 40: 4.98

Overview:

Mathews is a developmental prospect for the Colts' interior defensive line. His propensity as a run stuffer likely indicates that he will remain at DT, although based on his size Mathews fits the DT/DE "tweener" mold. Adds depth to a generally solid defensive tackle rotation.

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts like to develop stout run stuffers at the defensive tackle position, and Mathews' best attribute is his ability to gobble up running backs up the middle. He will work to try and earn a backup spot in training camp.

  • Yahoo Sports

    Played out of position as a five-technique guy at Cincinnati. However, he's got the first step and motor to be an effective three-technique on the Colts defense.

Scouting Reports

  • NFL.com (Grade: N/A)

    (No Analysis)

  • SI.com (Grade: 1.96 - Free Agent)

    Positives: Explosive one-gap lineman effective making plays in every direction of the field. Quickly gets off the snap, fluid changing direction and effective in back side pursuit. Easily gets out to the flanks and plays with both leverage and knee bend.

    Negatives: Undersized, handled at the point by single blocker and very slow to shed.

    Analysis: Mathews is a hard-working lineman who really watched his game take off last season. He has size limitations yet is athletic enough to be used as either a one-gap lineman or in the three technique position.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.5 - Free Agent / Rank: #32 DT)

    Mathews lacks power at the point of attack and struggles to anchor when the opposition runs at him. He does a nice job keeping his base down and extending his arms into blocks. But he lacks ideal balance on the move and consistently ends up on the ground. Mathews possesses a decent first step vs. the pass game, but he has a tendency to get too high on contact and struggles to fight his way through blocks. He looks a lot more dangerous when asked to stunt and showcases a good pop on contact. Mathews keeps his base down and has some lateral mobility inside. He isn't explosive when asked to close, but he can create push inside. He is easily sealed away from the ball in all areas of the game and is routinely overwhelmed on run plays inside.

  • Fox Sports

    A solid senior season helped Mathews cap his collegiate career in strong fashion, but the defensive tackle isn't expected to be selected in the NFL draft. He ended his career at Cincinnati by helping the Bearcats win the Big East before losing 51-24 to Florida in the Sugar Bowl. Despite that impressive 12-1 season by the Bearcats, Mathews managed just 3 1/2 sacks in his only season as a starter and accumulated 44 tackles to rank 10th on the team. However, he managed to lead Cincinnati with 12 1/2 tackles for loss and was named second-team all-Big East. He's considered undersized and scouts are wary of his lack of athleticism and speed while playing in a defense that gave up an average of 143.8 rushing yards and 20 touchdowns. Mathews is seen as a project for the NFL, having some strength off the line but not enough to power through offensive linemen. He didn't live up to the promise with Cincinnati after being named first-team all-conference three times in high school while also winning a conference title in wrestling. Those skills could cause an NFL team to take a chance on him for some added depth.

  • WalterFootball (Rank: #22 DT / Projection: Round 6/7)

    A one-year starter, Ricardo Mathews made the All-Big East Second Team. He finished the year with 12.5 TFL and 3.5 sacks.


With the 240th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Kavell Conner, LB, Clemson

Kavell Conner, LB, Clemson

Kavell Conner, LB, Clemson

Stats:

  • HT: 6'0 / WT: 242 / 40: 4.63

Overview:

Conner is a developmental prospect at WIL for the Colts. His speed and range suit him well for the weakside LB position in the Colts' system. Adds rotational depth to the LB corps and, as a compensatory pick, comes at a very good value for the Colts. Likely special-teams depth in his first year or two.

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    Conner will have to overcome his lack of height at the pro level, but possesses the speed and toughness to potentially contribute on special teams right away. The Colts have done well with undersized linebackers in the past, and Conner plays bigger than his stature would indicate.

  • Yahoo Sports

    A tight thumper inside who lacks ideal fluidity when asked to redirect but has some range as a linear athlete. More of a special teams guy.

Scouting Reports

  • NFL.com (Grade: 2.0)

    Conner is an undersized linebacker who was a productive, thee-year starter for the Tigers. He is a tough, hardnosed defender who can be an explosive tackler on contact. He can get engulfed at times versus larger linemen. He doesn't have great lateral quickness and burst but does run well to cover ground in pursuit. He can be inconsistent with his angles and run fits and doesn't always show good instincts reacting as plays unfold. He tends to be out of position with initial alignments and footwork but gives great effort to the pile. Conner is a good football player who has size limitations and needs to develop his coverage skills and overall reactions to contribute at the next level.

  • SI.com (Grade: 2.37 - Fence Player / Projection: Round 6)

    Positives: Athletic linebacker best in a one-gap system. Breaks down well, very active in his all-around game, flies around the field. Quickly changes direction, plays sideline to sideline, and covers a lot of area on the field. Physical, and works to get involved in the action. Shows ability in pursuit, chasing from the back side. Runs downfield with tight ends or even receivers in coverage.

    Negatives: Undersized and engulfed at the point of attack. Must improve his playing balance.

    Analysis: Connor is a prospect who significantly improved his game the past two seasons. He has size limitations and would be best as a weak-side linebacker in a one-gap system. He should be a serviceable backup at worst.

  • Mocking The Draft (Projection: N/A / Rank: N/A out of Top 200, #24 OLB)

    He may not have started all of Clemson's games in 2009, but Conner quietly had an excellent season. He finished with 103 tackles, seven tackles for a loss and two sacks. Conner is a good tackler who projects as a solid backup at the next level.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.8 - Backup/Depth Caliber / Rank: #19 OLB)

    A good athlete who showcases the range to consistently attack the football sideline-to-sideline, Conner does a nice job slipping blocks at the line of scrimmage. At times he will take himself out of plays and open up holes around him. He struggles to consistently recognize the play and can be slow to read his run/pass keys. Conner doesn't consistently take proper angles toward the play and isn't the most secure tackler in the open field. He lacks ideal power in his upper body and has a tendency to bounce off ball carriers when trying to close on the ball.

    He isn't physical at the line of scrimmage and struggles to take on blocks in the hole. Conner doesn't do a great job protecting his legs. He's easily washed away from the ball and when a lineman gets into his frame, the battle is over. But he displays good power and natural leverage when asked to tackle in the hole. He generates good power on contact and can quickly sniff out the ball inside and shoot the lanes toward the ball. He displays good overall range vs. the run game but doesn't make the amount of plays his athletic tools would indicate he should due to lack of instincts, awareness and the ability to beat blocks inside.

  • NFL Draft Countdown (Rating: 1 Star / Projection: Round 6/7/FA)

    (No Analysis)

  • Fox Sports

    Conner, a former star running back and safety at Manchester High School, in Richmond, Va., had never played linebacker when he arrived at Clemson in 2005. Conner, though, left the program with 309 tackles, leading the team in each of the last two seasons after redshirting in 2005 and recording 46 tackles as a reserve linebacker the following season. Conner, 23, who played in 52 games to tie a Clemson record, led the Tigers with 111 tackles in 2009 and had eight tackles for loss, two forced fumbles and two sacks. He was one of 35 players nominated for the 2009 Butkus Award, given annually to college football's top linebacker after leading Clemson with 125 tackles in 2008 and helping the Tigers rank in the top 15 in the Football Bowl Subdivision in total defense, pass defense and scoring defense.

  • FFToolbox (Rank: #N/A in Top 100)

    It is not that Conner is not having a good senior season, but scouts wanted to know that the Richmond, Virginia product was more than a one year wonder and so far the results are mixed. Where there are few questions about Conner is in his strength and health. Conner is extremely strong for a 6-1, 235 pound linebacker and that will fit in very well with some NFL teams. He has also never missed a game during his three and a half seasons with Clemson.

  • WalterFootball (Rank: #9 OLB / Projection: Round 5/6)

    Didn't start every game for Clemson, but still managed 103 tackles, seven TFL and two sacks as a senior.


With the 246th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Ray Fisher, DB, Indiana

Ray Fisher, DB, Indiana

Ray Fisher, DB, Indiana

Stats:

  • HT: 5'9 / WT: 185 / 40: 4.45

Overview:

Fisher was a KR/PR specialist in college who played WR his first three seasons, then switched to CB in his senior season. Likely drafted by the Colts as a potential kick returner, Fisher is a special-teams player who adds potential depth at both CB and WR.

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts lacked an explosive return man last year, and Fisher has the ability to become a difference-maker in that capacity. He will certainly compete for the job in training camp.

  • Yahoo Sports

    Fisher is a former wideout who moved to corner last season as a senior. More of a project, but can definitely help out on special teams as a return man.

Scouting Reports

  • NFL.com (Grade: N/A)

    (No Analysis)

  • SI.com (Grade: 2.29 - Practice Squad / Projection: Round 7)

    Positives: Athletic prospect who has shown himself to be a top return specialist. Displays solid awareness, effectively reads receivers eyes and displays a nice move to the throw. Battles with opponents throughout the action, possesses a burst of speed, and plays faster than his forty time. Correctly positions himself against opponents, sized well, and possesses a better-than-average ball skills. Quickly releases off the line of scrimmage at receiver, uses his hands to separate from defenders, and comes back to the ball out of breaks. Consistently finds the open spot the field and extends to make the reception away from his frame. Displays strong hands at receiver. Did a solid job on coverage units besides returning punts and kicks at Indiana.

    Negatives: Lacks the great bulk and will struggle in battles. Shows hesitation in his game at cornerback.

    Analysis: Fischer has been productive in all three facets of the game on offense, defense, as well a special teams. He never truly developed at one position, but we prefer him at receiver. Fischer could be a surprise undrafted rookie in 2010 who impacts the game on special teams.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.5 - Free Agent / Rank: #45 CB)

    A former wideout who made the transition to CB as a senior. Fisher has good short-area quickness and straight-line speed but doesn't look natural as a corner. He has some ability as a PR/KR man but looked more promising as a wideout.

2010 NFL Draft – Colts: Round 5

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

With the 162nd overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Brody Eldridge, TE, Oklahoma

Brody Eldridge, TE, Oklahoma

Brody Eldridge, TE, Oklahoma

Stats:

  • HT: 6'5 / WT: 261 / 40: 4.85
  • Career: Started at TE, OG, C
  • 2009 Second-Team All Big-12

Overview:

Eldridge is a versatile player on the offensive line, having played Center, Guard, and Tight End; but his primary strength is as a run-blocking Tight End. Eldridge is considered by many as one of, if not the, best run-blocking Tight Ends in the draft. It is highly likely that the Colts drafted Eldridge for precisely that role, as he would be an incredibly small OG, even by previous Colts' standards.

Player Comparisons:

N/A

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts just picked the best blocking TE in the entire draft. Eldridge started games at center, guard, and tight end this season for the Sooners. In fact, he was an all-conference FB as well. He's nasty, he's tough and he will upgrade the Colts' run game and be a tremendous complement to Dallas Clark.

  • Yahoo Sports

    Has played both tight end and offensive line for the Sooners over the past couple years and give the Colts one of the better blocking tight ends in the draft.

Scouting Reports

  • NFL.com (Grade: 2.0)

    Eldridge is a big, powerful blocking tight end who has very limited receiving skills and lacks the speed to be any kind of threat downfield. He has struggled to stay healthy for a full season and missed time due to a neck injury during his senior year. He also spent some time at guard to take advantage of his size and pass-blocking skills. He can be a powerful blocker once he gets his hands on opponents but also can be late off the snap and often gets beaten by quick defensive linemen. He could get a look as either an offensive lineman or tight end but will need time to develop.

  • SI.com (Grade: 2.27 - Practice Squad)

    Positives: Well-sized blocking tight end who will also get consideration as a developmental offensive lineman at the next level. Blocks with good knee bend, leverage, and quickly gets off the snap into defenders. Strong, turns opponents off the middle of the line and plays with good awareness. Keeps his head on a swivel, displays good vision, and works until the whistle blows. Keeps his feet moving in pass protection and anchors at the point of attack.

    Negatives: Stiff, over-extends into blocks and lacks balance. Marginal speed and not much of a pass-catching threat.

    Analysis: Eldridge has done a terrific job in his role the past four seasons and effectively helped out when called upon to play on the offensive line last season. We like him best as a blocking tight end brought onto the field during short-yardage situations.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.7 - Backup/Depth Caliber / Rank: #22 TE)

    Eldridge is a limited athlete who struggles sliding his feet laterally in pass protection. He lacks the power to hold off opposing linemen once they gain a step on him. But he does a nice job getting off the ball quickly in the run game and working his legs through contact. He possesses a strong upper body and is tough to shed at the point of attack, but he lacks the fluidity to stay in front of defenders in space. Isn't much of a threat in the pass game. Lacks natural hands and the athleticism to separate against man coverage at the next level. He saw time during the 2009 season at left guard and showcased the fluidity to slide laterally and hold his own inside. He obviously needs to add weight, but he does have some intrigue as a potential No. 3 tight end or developmental offensive lineman.

  • NFL Draft Countdown (Rating: 1 Star / Projection: Round 6/7/FA/ Rank: #16 TE)

    (No Analysis)

  • Fox Sports

    Listed at tight end, Eldridge is more of a jack of all trades on the offensive line, having also started at center and guard during his senior season. He would have seen fewer snaps at tight end had Sooners star Jermaine Gresham not suffered a season-ending knee injury prior to the opener. Eldridge caught a total of 13 passes for 98 yards and one score during his four-year career, but his value lies nearly entirely in his blocking ability. He is big, strong, powerful and has an excellent work ethic. His biggest negative is a lack of speed, which not only inhibits his ability to be a receiver, but also can make him slow off the line and give him occasional trouble blocking quicker defenders. Durability is also a concern. Eldridge missed the end of his senior season due to a stress fracture in his neck, which he says has fully healed. Eldridge should get a look in some team's training camp, but whether he's drafted appears iffy. He'll garner interest from teams looking for a blocker to fill in at tight end or other spots along the line in emergency situations.

  • WalterFootball (Rank: #33 TE / Projection: FA)

    (No Analysis)

2010 NFL Draft – Colts: Round 4

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

With the 129th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Jacques McClendon, OG, Tenn

Jacques McClendon, OG, Tenn

Jacques McClendon, OG, Tenn

Stats:

  • HT: 6'2 / WT: 325 / 40: SPD
  • Career: Stats N/A

Overview:

McClendon is a big, run-blocking beast of an OG. Projected as a likely undrafted free agent, some consider McClendon to be a reach for the Colts in the fourth round. However, the Colts generally select OL in the mid-rounds of the draft, and tend to select "project" picks who can be developed in the Colts' system. McClendon fits that mold, and continues an apparent trend of increasing size on the offensive line.

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts add depth to their interior line with the selection of Jacques McClendon. In selecting the former Tennessee standout, the Colts are hoping to find a young player to develop for a bigger role in the near future. This is another move by the Colts to solidify their depth on the offensive line.

  • ESPN.com

    McClendon possesses great size, a wide body and excellent inline strength. While he is a limited overall athlete, he has enough quickness and lateral mobility to hold his own on the interior at the next level.

  • Yahoo Sports

    A thick, well-built guard who adds some much-needed pop and power to the Colts offensive line inside.

Scouting Reports

  • NFL.com (Grade: N/A)

    McClendon could become a developmental prospect as a potential run blocker in short-yardage situations. He is a smart player with good strength and decent speed and may eventually become a contributor.

  • SI.com (Grade: 1.5 - Free Agent)

    (No Analysis)

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.4 - Free Agent / Rank: #36 OG)

    McClendon isn't a gifted athlete when asked to get out in space. He looks heavy-footed on the move and struggles to reach/seal defenders in space. He isn't effective on slide-down blocks and lacks the type of body control to stay on his man through the play. But he showcases above-average power as an inline run blocker and exhibits the lower body strength to create off the snap. He lacks ideal fluidity when asked to pass protect on an island, doesn't get off the ball quickly and struggles to mirror in space. He's at his best in a phone booth where he does a nice job keeping his base down, playing with natural leverage on contact and generating good power on his punch.

  • Fox Sports

    Like many of his Tennessee teammates, McClendon saw his draft stock slip with the Vols' 4-4 finish in SEC play last season. But the Cleveland, Tenn., product could still ride his strength to a shot at the next level. McClendon has a very strong lower body and the power to drive defenders off the ball. In addition to his toughness at the line, he has a quick pivot out of his stance and the ability to reach a moving target down the line. McClendon's technique is still somewhat raw, and he struggles to get his hands inside at times, but he's persistent and able to finish most of his blocks. His ability to get - and perhaps stay - on the field in the NFL will likely depend on whether or not he can improve in pass protection. He's a little narrow at the base and thus vulnerable to the bull rush. He'll most likely get a look as a free agent after the draft.

2010 NFL Draft – Colts: Round 3

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

With the XXth overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Kevin Thomas, CB, USC

Kevin Thomas, CB, USC

Kevin Thomas, CB, USC

Stats:

  • HT: 6'0 / WT: 192 / 40: 4.48
  • Career: 1-year starter at USC, 57 tackles, 11 PD
  • 2009 Second-Team All PAC-10

Overview:

Marlin Jackson, Kelvin Hayden

Player Comparisons:

Thomas is a quick, physical, if inexperienced, cornerback. His height and weight are reminiscent more of Marlin Jackson and Kelvin Hayden than the shorter/smaller Jerraud Powers, Jacob Lacey, or Tim Jennings. The Colts had a definite need for depth at CB (see: Tim Jennings in the Super Bowl), and have shown the ability to coach up inexperienced players (see: Powers and Lacey). Thomas provides an upgrade and depth as a dime- (or perhaps even nickel-) back.

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts add depth to their secondary with the addition of Kevin Thomas. The Southern California standout had been one of the stars of the pre-draft season, and his intriguing skill set could flourish in the Colts' zone-based scheme.

  • ESPN.com

    Thomas has a great combination of size and top-end speed. In addition he shows the ability to turn, locate and find the football. While he is a bit tight in the hips when having to quickly turn and run, he still provides enough athletic ability to develop into a quality starter in the Colts' defensive scheme.

  • Yahoo Sports

    A physical, long-armed press corner who has the ability to re-route receivers off the line. Thomas lacks ideal range down the field but is a good fit for the Colts at this spot.

Scouting Reports

  • NFL.com (Grade: 7.1)

    Thomas was a starter for only one season at USC. He has a good combination of size and athleticism for the cornerback position but doesn't have great strength in block protection or in tackling in run support. His length enables him to make plays on the ball, but he is inconsistent to re-route receivers off the line of scrimmage. He is an inconsistent reactor which makes him vulnerable to double moves and losing leverage in coverage as well as in run support. Thomas breaks down well in space but isn't a reliable open-field tackler. He runs well, but his technique (footwork, transition angles, etc.) need to improve for him to be consistently effective in both man and zone coverages. Thomas has the talent and size to develop into an effective NFL cornerback, but he needs to improve in several areas as well as answer durability concerns at the next level.

  • SI.com (Grade: 2.79 - First-Year Contributor / Projection: Round 2/3)

    Positives: Nice-sized cornerback best facing the action. Stays low in his backpedal, quick flipping his hips and has a burst out of his plant. Displays better than average ball awareness, plays heads-up football, and fights hard to defend the throw.

    Negatives: Seems to struggle in zone and does not show great route recognition. Slow locating the ball with his back to the action.

    Analysis: After being used primarily as a backup prior to the 2009 season, Thomas showed flashes of ability last year. He possesses the size and the underlying skill to play at the next level as a nickel or dime back, yet he is an unfinished product and will need time to develop his game.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.8 - Backup/Depth Caliber / Rank: #22 CB)

    A tall, long-armed corner who showcases good physicality off the line and loves to use his length to disrupt timing and bump receivers in the pass game, Thomas displays good awareness and ball skills in coverage and looks natural hand fighting with receivers in the pass game and closing on the ball. He displays decent click and close ability, but he is always up so tight to the receiver that he never has far to go. But he isn't the most fluid athlete when asked to change directions and quickly get out of his breaks. He has a tendency to get caught with his footwork overextended and fails to make up for a false step.

    Thomas isn't nearly as effective in off-coverage, where he needs to rely on this athleticism and footwork to win. He displays good straight-line speed when asked to turn and run downfield. Overall, he has the size, length and ball skills to make a roster as a bump corner, and I could see him carving out a niche as a team's nickel/dime corner, but he also needs to play bump on the outside.

  • NFL Draft Countdown (Rating: 2 Stars / Ranking: #14 CB / Projection: Round 3/4)

    Strengths: Ideal height and bulk --- Long arms --- Smooth athlete --- Adequate speed --- Is quick and agile with excellent feet --- Fluid hips and transitions well --- Can turn and run with wideouts downfield --- Good ball skills --- Strong --- Physical --- Gets a nice jam at the line --- Solid instincts and awareness --- Confident with  a  short memory --- Upside.

    Weaknesses: Health / Durability is a major concern --- Tackling ability leaves much to be desired --- Is not real explosive and lacks a burst --- Struggles to recover when beat --- Is not overly powerful --- Doesn't have great hands --- Plays Tall --- Marginal  Production --- Relatively Inexperienced.

  • Fox Sports

    A broken foot and shoulder surgery claimed much of Thomas' first two seasons at Southern California, but he still ended up making an impact, intercepting three passes while serving mostly a backup role in 2008 before earning All-Pac 10 second-team honors as a senior this past season. He finished the 2009 campaign with 57 tackles and 11 pass break-ups, although he didn't have an interception and wasn't able establish himself as an elite prospect. Thomas has good length for an NFL cornerback, and he proved his athleticism with showings as a top performer in the 40-yard dash, bench press, broad jump and 60-yard shuttle at the NFL Combine. But some doubts remain about his reaction time and technique in coverage, and his consistency is not where it needs to be at the next level. Durability is also a concern following his banged-up collegiate career. Thomas is probably too good of an athlete to slip through the draft in April, but he's an unfinished project as far as the NFL goes, which means he'll likely fall to the later rounds.

2010 NFL Draft – Colts: Round 2

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

With the 63th overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Pat Angerer, MLB, Iowa

Pat Angerer, MLB, Iowa

Pat Angerer, MLB, Iowa

Stats:

  • HT: 6'0 / WT: 235 / 40: 4.69
  • Career: 2009 - 135 tackles, 4 TFL
  • 2009 First-Team All American, 2009 Second-Team All American, 2009 First-Team All Big-Ten

Overview:

Most draft analysts projected Angerer to be a mid-round prospect and a solid contributor and eventual starter at ILB. Angerer is a solid-tackling ball hawk who contains well. Excellent run defender and shows speed in covering the field. That the Colts took Angerer in the second round perhaps indicates that the team thinks he has the potential to be groomed as Gary Brackett's eventual replacement.

Player Comparisons:

Gary Brackett

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts add a solid all-around player in Pat Angerer. The former Iowa standout was very productive as a collegian, and shows outstanding instincts for the position. Though he isn't over athletic, he plays faster than he tests and is an underrated playmaker. He gives the Colts much-needed depth.

  • ESPN.com

    What he brings: Angerer is a three-down inside linebacker who can hold his own in coverage and shows above-average closing speed when asked to rush the passer. He needs to improve his power and ability to stack and shed. That said, he is a sound tackler with above-average range.

  • Yahoo Sports

    An ideal fit for the Colts' Cover 2 scheme. Angerer is an undersized guy who runs well as a linear athlete and knows how to find the football in all areas of the game.

Scouting Reports

  • Draft Board Insider (Rank: #6 ILB)

    (No Analysis)

  • NFL.com (Grade: 6.2)

    Angerer is an undersized linebacker that has been a very productive two year starter for the Hawkeyes. He is a tough competitive player that leverages the ball well. He understands angles and run fits well but gets smothered too often by offensive lineman. Angerer is best when covered up and likely needs to be in a scheme at the next level that will let him free flow to the pile. Angerer is a good athlete but may have some limitations in pure man coverage. He is a solid open field tackler but doesn’t pack a punch on contact. Angerer is a good football player that is limited some by his size but should contribute on special teams and in a backup role as a rookie.

  • SI.com (Grade: 2.63 - Future Starter)

    Positives: Fierce, run-defending linebacker who's been a very productive the past two seasons. Displays terrific instincts and wherewithal on the field, remains disciplined with assignments and gives effort until the whistle blows. Fires up the field in run defense, displays better than average speed to the flanks and a stout run defender. Fills the correct holes in run defense, works hard to get off blocks and consistently around the ball-carrier. Fights with his hands to get off blocks, breaks down well, nicely redirects to the action.

    Negatives: Gets caught up in the traffic. Not quick flipping his hips in coverage and does not get depth on drops. Struggles making plays with his back to the ball.

    Analysis: Angerer has been incredibly productive at Iowa and is a terrific run-defending linebacker who also displayed coverage skills during the combine. Lacks the great measurables to play in the middle yet could be a solid inside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment.

  • Mocking The Draft (Rank: #100 out of Top 200, #4 ILB)

    Coverage: Angerer excels at figuring out screen plays and blowing them up. Doesn't get fooled by play action when he's asked to drop back. Has lined up against receivers on the line, but shouldn't be considered a great coverage linebacker. Still, Angerer has good enough awareness to stay on the field on obvious passing downs and cover an area in zone.

    Instincts: Was a two-year starter who played in 43 career games. Has good instincts and always seems to be playing on the balls of his feet. Plays with a lot of aggressiveness and flies all over the field. Read quickly and doesn't make false movements.

    Pass rush: Was not asked to blitz a lot and shouldn't be. That's because he doesn't have very good size and will engulfed by blockers. Struggles to disengage, even though he gives good effort.

    Pursuit: Angerer is a super high motor guy. Although he's a little stiff in his movements, he makes plays all over the field. He may never be the first guy to the ball carrier, but he closes fast and finishes off a lot of plays.

    Run defense: Very smart as a run defender. Keeps his shoulders square to the line when the play is still in front of him and shuffles down. More quick than strong to avoid blockers. May not attack the line of scrimmage as much as you'd like, but rarely allowed running backs to get past him in his area.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 5.7 - Backup/Depth Caliber)

    A short, tightly wound linebacker who does a nice job locating the football, Angerer is very active inside the box. He isn't long-armed but displays a quick, compact punch which allows him to keep himself clean when working his way through traffic. He lacks ideal size and has a tendency to get washed out of plays away from his frame too easily, struggling to work sideline-to-sideline. Is the definition of a straight-line athlete, displays a good burst in pursuit and gets up to full speed quickly. Is a very sound tackler who consistently takes good angles toward the ball and wraps up well on contact.

    Lacking fluidity in coverage, Angerer is forced to open up his hips initially in his drop and sidesaddle his way down the field. Struggles quickly getting out of his breaks and looks stiff when asked to redirect and change directions in space. Yet he possesses great instincts in the pass game and consistently gets good jumps on the ball by reading the quarterback's eyes. Displays natural ball skills and good hands when asked to go up and make a play on the ball. Overall, he's an instinctive, hard-nosed linebacker with impressive closing speed for the position. He lacks the ideal size, but he has a place in the NFL. Looks more like reserve middle linebacker/special teams guy than a starter.

  • NFL Draft Countdown (Rating: 2 Stars / Projection: Round 3/4)

    (No Analysis)

  • Fox Sports

    Thought to be limited athletically, Angerer had unexpectedly strong workouts at the combine. He ran the 40-yard dash in 4.69 seconds, finished ninth among linebackers with a 4.29-second 20-yard shuttle and tied for eighth in the bench press with 26 repetitions. That performance will help discount the notion that his production at Iowa was only a product of hard work, instincts and smarts. His 145 tackles as a senior rank fifth in Hawkeyes history. Of those stops, 14 1/2 were for loss as Angerer went on to earn second-team All-American honors. He first caught the eyes of scouts as a junior, posting 107 tackles and five interceptions while developing into a team leader who inspired teammates with his intensity. Angerer is a tough run defender, effective at making his way through blockers to get to the ball carrier. Angerer, though, needs to use his hands and leverage better to disengage from blocks. He's easily taken out of plays when he isn't able to avoid offensive linemen. He's an effective tackler, but isn't a big hitter. In pass coverage, Angerer is smooth when dropping into zones, reads the quarterback's eyes well and has good hands. Play-action passes and misdirection rarely fool him. He has the quickness to recover after a false step. Angerer's effort at the combine should bump him up from a late pick to the middle rounds.

  • FFToolbox (Rank: N/A in Top 100)

    Pat Angerer had a very solid 2009 season. Angerer didn't see much action during his first two years with Iowa, appearing in 17 games and recording 6 tackles on special teams. He took over a starting position as a junior when he finished the season with 107 tackles, 6.5 tackles for loss, 1 sack, 5 interceptions, and 8 passes broken up. Angerer continued to anchor a strong Hawkeyes defense this year with 145 tackles, 5 tackles for loss, 1 sack, 1 interception, 6 passes broken up, and 2 forced fumble in the Hawkeyes 13 games. Like many players coached by Kirk Ferentz, Angerer is a solid all around football player. Hawkeyes don't always look like stars, but NFL coaches know they know how to play the game. He's slightly undersized to play middle linebacker in the NFL, but makes up for this with great instincts. Angerer is one of those players who will find his way onto a team's roster one way or another. He is likely a fourth round selection, and would give a team a good young reserve (or possibly a starter) and likely an outstanding special teams contributor.

  • WalterFootball (Rank: #3 ILB)

    You don't want to mess with a guy who is "more than anger." Projecting as a 4-3 middle linebacker, Pat Angerer garnered a whopping 135 tackles and four TFL in 2009.

  • NFL Draft Geek (Rank: #7 ILB / Tier 2)

    Pat Angerer is about as reliable as they come, an experienced leader in Kirk Ferentz' pro-style defense, sure tackler, and is good enough in coverage to stay on the field on 3rd down. Is a very good athlete, nice speed (4.7), is comfortable in space, and very quick feet to evade blockers. On the flip side, Angerer needs to get stronger, he doesn't take on blockers well, and gets shut down at the line of scrimmage. He is not a much of a pass rusher, and doesn't shoot through the line to make plays in the backfield. Also has some minor injury concerns that derailed his first 2 years at Iowa. Angerer is N.F.L ready, and could play significant time as a rookie. While not flashy, Angerer is a very reliable player who will get the job done, he doesn't have the greatest upside, but should have a lengthy career in the N.F.L. Angerer should get picked in the 3rd round.

2010 NFL Draft – Colts: Round 1

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Draft, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

With the 31st overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts take:

Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU

Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU

Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU

Stats:

  • HT: 6'2 / WT: 255 / 40:4.69
  • Career: 139 tackles, 28.5 sacks, 39 TFL, 7 FF, 2 INT
  • 2008/2009 First-Team All-American, 2009 Lott Trophy (Defensive IMPACT player) Winner, 2009 Hendricks Award (Top Defensive End) winner

Overview:

Hughes is a "tweener" pass-rushing DE in the mold of Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis. He is considered to be the best pass-rusher in the draft, and is known for his speed, tenacity, motor, and football intelligence. Many projected Hughes as a Round 2/3 pick who would move to OLB in a 3-4 defense, due to his lack of size at DE (or, in other words: exactly what the experts predicted for Freeney).

Player Comparisons:

Dwight Freeney, Robert Mathis, LaMarr Woodley, Demarcus Ware

Bio:

Draft Analysis:

  • NFL.com

    The Colts' [sic] fortify their pass rush with the addition of Jerry Hughes. Although Indianapolis retains Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis, it still needed another rusher to alleviate some of the pressure on the duo. In Hughes, the Colts get a hard-working edge rusher with outstanding quickness and burst. The Colts have the luxury of slowly integrating Hughes into the lineup, and can groom him into a starter after a year or two.

  • ESPN.com

    What he brings: Hughes is a player who has a non-stop motor. He boasts great quickness, body control and the ability to bend and accelerate to close on quarterbacks. He also shows an array of pass-rush moves which keeps offensive tackles on their toes to both the inside and outside. He had a very productive, durable career. Hughes fits perfectly at the NFL level as an undersized pass-rush specialist off the edge.

    How he fits: Hughes is in the same mold of Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis. While the duo had 23 sacks combined, both players have been at risk of wearing down. Freeney and Mathis are undersized defensive ends at or nearing the age of 30. Raheem Brock was released, so depth was needed and Hughes will immediately be an effective pass-rushing reserve for the Colts.

  • Yahoo Sports

    Hughes is the kind of undersized pass rusher the Colts love. He has a variety of ways to get after the quarterback, knows how to change directions in tight quarters and plays till the whistle. He isn't an ideal fit for every defense but looks like a potential impact-caliber pass rusher in the Colts' scheme.

Scouting Reports

  • Draft Board Insider

    Scouting Report: The 3-4 defense is becoming more and more of the norm in the league, and it's success hinges on having outside linebackers who can rush the quarterback.  In this draft, Hughes is easily the best 3-4 rush OLB/DE hybrid in this draft.  He's got ideal size, that allows his to be strong at the point of attack against the run, can engage a lineman, shed them and get to the ball carrier.  But his strength is that first step as a pass rusher.  Hand on the ground, no player in the country is as explosive as Hughes.  He does a great job with his hands, keeps his pad level good and can get up and under larger players, split double teams, and blow past slower linemen.  He plays with great leverage, and rarely loses a one on one.  He's got a motor that doesn't quit, and you rarely see him take a play off.  Where he'll need work is in run support, where he does get washed away at times, and in coverage, where he's going to have to learn much more about coverage and be much more fluid in his drops and be able to turn and run with tight ends and backs.

    Draft Status: Most mock drafts don't have Hughes in the first round but I disagree.  When you see what great 3-4 defenses have, it's the ability to generate a consistent pass rush from their OLB.  There is no player in the draft who can do that like Hughes can, so I am certain some team will snatch him up in the first round.

    Final Analysis: I may be in the minority, but I think Hughes is one of the 5 best defensive players in this entire draft (With Ndamukong Suh, Gerald McCoy, Eric Berry, and Joe Haden).  His explosion off the edge, and his tenacity going after the quarterback is so fun to watch.  Hughes may not show up in shorts the way some pundits want, but he's a straight up lunch pail football player, and brings it every single play.  You can't ask for much more than that.  The best pass rusher in the draft bar none, and is going to make some team very happy.

    Reminds me of: LaMarr Woodley, OLB Pittsburgh Steelers-Same body type, same college experience, and same explosive nature that so Woodley has translated very well to his new position.  Honestly, I think Hughes has a chance to be much better.

  • NFL.com (Grade: 8.2)

    Hughes is a defensive end that has been the most disruptive defender for the Horned Frogs over the past two years. He is a tweener (size and athleticism) at the next level and may fit as an undersized end in a 4-3 scheme or an inexperienced outside backer in an odd front. Hughes is best attacking the line of scrimmage rushing the passer or penetrating to disrupt the run. He uses his hands well to control blockers on the edge. He also shows an expansive pass rush package. Hughes has dropped in zone coverage at times but is most comfortable with his hand on the ground. He is a solid tackler in the open field utilizing great balance and body positioning. Regardless of where Hughes aligns at the next level he should contribute as a rookie due to his instincts, toughness, athleticism and energy.

  • SI.com (Grade: 3.02 - First-Year Contributor)

    Positives: Explosive college defensive end who projects to outside linebacker at the next level. Displays terrific first step quickness off the snap, plays with good knee bend and gets leverage on opponents. Quickly changes direction, fluid moving to every area of the field and strings plays out laterally, getting to the flanks to tackle ball-carriers. Shows ability in pursuit, keeps his feet and hands active throughout the action and fast up the field or out to the sidelines. Constantly doubled by opponents, plays with good balance and displays a degree of explosion in his game. Forceful, deceptively strong in his lower body and gets push up the field.

    Negatives: Lacks bulk, struggles against large blockers and will be engulfed at the point of attack. Out-positioned from the play and gets caught up in the trash. Relatively effective in space yet has not been asked to make plays in reverse all that often in college.

    Analysis: Hughes was an impact defensive player on the college level and has a lot his skills for the NFL. His height is a limiting factor, yet he'll offer possibilities as a one-gap pass rusher or outside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment. Possesses a good degree of upside, and has starting potential at the next level.

    Projection: 1-2

  • Mocking The Draft (Projection: Round 2 / Rank: #22 out of Top 200, #6 OLB)

    Pass rush: Plays two yards deep outside. Very good footwork. Properly adjusts his feet to get around the corner quickly. Pass rush moves are ordinary. Mostly a speed rusher. Never really showed consistently that he was comfortable with his spin move.

    Pursuit: The effort Hughes displays is outstanding. He's a very aggressive player who always plays until the whistle. Has good speed in pursuit. Lateral movement is solid.

    Quickness/Explosion: Good first step off the snap. With his hand down, Hughes has as good of a burst off the snap as any pass rusher in the nation. Easily fires past linemen who don't quickly get into position.

    ...

    Final word: As a pass rusher, Hughes is very good. But he'll need to do a better job against the run and learn how to drop into coverage. He shows a solid first step, which helped him lead the nation in sacks in 2008. He shows above average lateral quickness, but needs to learn how to shed blocks better.

    He'll be a good value pick for a 3-4 team in the second round.

  • National Football Post (Grade: 6.8 - Becomes a starter in his rookie year…becomes a solid NFL player who has no real weakness…can’t be exploited or consistently taken out of games.)

    A gifted athlete off the edge who showcases a good first step and has the speed to consistently threaten the corner, Hughes looks even more explosive when asked to stand up from a two-point stance and can accelerate around the edge. He's a natural bender who coils up well and likes to play from a four-point stance at times. He has little wasted motion and does a nice job maximizing his first step. He possesses good balance and pad level when asked to turn the corner and likes to be violent with his hands when setting up blocks. He does a nice job changing gears on the outside, using his length to defeat the block, and is sudden in space. Also, Hughes displays a physical element to his game. He isn't afraid to work the bull-rush and does a good job getting under the pad level of opposing linemen on contact, pumping his legs and collapsing the pocket on the outside. He likes to work his bull-rush as a counter move when offensive tackles start overplaying his outside run.

    He isn't the most instinctive rusher off the snap and at times will struggle to time up the snap count. But he does a nice job finding the ball in the run game and working his way toward the action. He's a bit undersized and can be overwhelmed and sealed from the ball in the run game, but he works himself off blocks well and does a nice job dropping his pad level on contact and exploding down the line to make the play. Overall, he's a gifted pass rusher who can pressure the pocket in a variety of ways. He has some versatility but to me looks like a bona fide starting 3-4 OLB at the next level.

  • NFL Draft Countdown (Rating: 3 Stars / Projection: Round 2/3)

    Strengths:
    Extremely athletic and smooth --- Great speed and acceleration --- Very quick and agile --- A terror when bending off the edge --- Fantastic first step --- Terrific range --- Does a great job in pursuit --- Has a burst to close --- Active with a non-stop motor --- Fluid in space and changes directions well --- Good hands and ball skills --- Hard worker --- Student of the game --- Offers positional and schematic versatility --- Productive

    Weaknesses:
    Undersized in terms of both height and bulk with a thin frame --- Is a liability versus the run --- Gets driven off the line --- Struggles to get off blocks --- Doesn't play strong --- Repertoire of pass rush moves is limited --- Does not use his hands well --- Can be too aggressive at times --- A  little  inconsistent --- Might have to make a position change.

  • Fox Sports

    A first-team All-American, Hughes made a transformation from prep running back to standout defensive end at TCU. As he moves on to the next level, Hughes will likely be asked to make another transition, this time to outside linebacker. His lack of bulk would make him a liability against the run, so a move to a stand-up position in a 3-4 scheme may be the best way to maximize his athleticism and ability as a pass rusher on the edge. Hughes was highly productive despite facing constant double teams. A two-time Mountain West defensive player of the year, he led the Horned Frogs in sacks (11.5) and tackles for loss (15) as a senior. Hughes forced a fumble and recovered it in TCU's loss to Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl. He was a finalist for the Bronko Nagurski Trophy, awarded to the nation's top defensive player, and won the Ted Hendricks defensive end of the year award. He was also awarded the Lott Trophy, which honors on-field performance and personal character among defensive players. Hughes led the nation with 15 sacks the previous season, his first as a full-time starter, adding six forced fumbles and two interceptions. He's fast and has an excellent first step, but his repertoire of moves as a pass rusher is limited. Hughes ran the 40-yard dash in 4.69 seconds at the combine. As a student of the game and a hard worker, though, he has an excellent chance of developing under the right tutelage. If he came out after his junior year, Hughes had a chance to be a first- or early second-round pick. He wanted to fulfill a promise to his parents to finish his degree. Now, due to a deep class of outside linebackers, Hughes will likely be pushed into the second or third round.

  • Rivals.com

    A gifted athlete off the edge who showcases a good first step and has the speed to consistently threaten the corner, Hughes looks even more explosive when asked to stand up from a two-point stance and can accelerate around the edge. He's a natural bender who coils up well and likes to play from a four-point stance at times. He has little wasted motion and does a nice job maximizing his first step. He possesses good balance and pad level when asked to turn the corner and likes to be violent with his hands when setting up blocks. He does a nice job changing gears on the outside, using his length to defeat the block, and is sudden in space. Also, Hughes displays a physical element to his game. He isn't afraid to work the bull-rush and does a good job getting under the pad level of opposing linemen on contact, pumping his legs and collapsing the pocket on the outside. He likes to work his bull-rush as a counter move when offensive tackles start overplaying his outside run. He isn't the most instinctive rusher off the snap and at times will struggle to time up the snap count. But he does a nice job finding the ball in the run game and working his way toward the action. He's a bit undersized and can be overwhelmed and sealed from the ball in the run game, but he works himself off blocks well and does a nice job dropping his pad level on contact and exploding down the line to make the play. Overall, he's a gifted pass rusher who can pressure the pocket in a variety of ways. He has some versatility but to me looks like a bona fide starting 3-4 OLB at the next level.

  • FFToolbox (Rank: #22 in Top 100)

    Hughes will not fit into every NFL system. It has become quite clear that he is a linebacker who was an end in college. He simply lacks the size and strength to play at the end spot at the next level. That could slip him down into the early portion of the second round, but after a solid combine, Hughes is holding onto hopes of hearing his name called on the first day of the draft.

  • WalterFootball

    Summary: Hughes earns my first-round, 4-star grade as a 3-4 rush linebacker. His athleticism and motor is simply too much for me to not grade him out higher than everyone else. He is my No. 1 3-4 outside linebacker in the draft and I expect his stock to soar among the 3-4 teams in the league. He was simply too productive at TCU, and despite his lack of height we can see what Elvis Dumervil did last season with his exceptional first step and speed off the edge. Hughes is a projected late-first to second-round pick, but could end up going in the top 25 picks when it's all said and done, much like Larry English.

    Player Comparison: Robert Mathis. Mathis is an undersized pass rusher who plays with amazing effort, but is a liability against the run.

  • NFL Draft Geek

    Jerry Hughes seems to be the most underrated prospect in this years draft, he is in our eyes is [sic] the best Pass Rusher in the draft, but not rated nearly as highly by most. His biggest asset is his speed[;] he is the fastest pass rushing prospect in the draft, and is an absolute terror around the edge. Technically, he is the most NFL ready[;] he plays with great pad level, a high football IQ, uses his hands and long arms well, quick feet, and has a natural ability to sack the Quarterback. The reason he is rated so much lower on other websites and "experts" boards, is that he struggles against the run and is not all that strong. Those are legitimate criticisms, but his specific skill set is exactly why we like him so much. His skill set is perfect for a 3-4 defense, where he can focus on using his speed and athletic ability to get after the quarterback. There is no doubt from anybody that he has been the best pass rusher the past 2 years in college, and if correctly slotted into a 3-4 rush linebacker he absolutely will be able to continue his pace and be an elite pass rusher in the Pros. He is also a coaches [sic] dream when you add in his physicality, effort, intensity, and smarts. Comparable to Cowboys DE/OLB Demarcus Ware.

An Analysis of the Colts-Jets AFC Championship Match-Up

Filed in SportsTags: Colts, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

As the Colts took care of business in a dominating win over the Ravens, and the Jets pulled off the only real upset of the playoffs thus far, many of the talking heads are already  making noises about the Jets being a "team of destiny".

The reasons espoused for such an opinion are the Jets' run game and defense vs. the Colts' run defense and game, the Jets' supposed "momentum", and the Jets' Week 16 win over the Colts in Indianapolis. What do I think?

Hogwash.

Allow me to explain.

The Jets Run the Ball and Stop the Run

Much is being made of the Jets' #1 rush offense vs. Colts' #24 rush defense, and the Colts #32 rush offense vs. the Jets' #8 rush defense. The Jets rushed for 172.2 yds per game while the Colts yielded 126.5 yards per game. The Colts rushed for 80.9 yards per game while the Jets yielded 98.6 yards per game.

So what?

Yards do not equal points - especially for the Colts defense, and for the Colts rushing offense. Far more important than yardage totals are scoring totals.

Total Scoring

The Colts allowed 19.2 (#8) points per game while the Jets scored 21.0 (#17) points per game. The Jets allowed 14.8 (#1) points per game while the Colts scored 26.0 (#7) points per game. So, the Colts' #7 scoring offense will face the Jets' #1 scoring defense, while the Jets' #17 scoring offense will face the Colts' #8 scoring defense.

The Colts were 15-0 against teams with an average scoring defense of #17. The Colts have beaten the #3 scoring defense (Ravens) twice, the #4 scoring defense (49ers), and the #5 scoring defense (Patriots) - not to mention, the Colts put up more than the Jets' average points allowed per game (15 vs. 14.8) in barely one half of play.

The Jets were 11-7 against teams with an average scoring offense of #17. The Jets have lost to the #1 scoring offense (Saints) and the #6 scoring offense (Patriots), and have beaten the #4 scoring offense (Chargers) and the #6 scoring offense (Patriots).

Advantage: Colts.

Run Scoring

The Colts allowed 10 (#7) rushing TDs while the Jets scored 21 (#3) rushing TDs. The Jets allowed 11 (#11) rushing TDs while the Colts scored 16 (#12) rushing TDs.

So, the Colts' #12 rush-TD offense will face the Jets' #11 rush-TD defense, while the Jets' #3 rush-TD offense will face the Colts' #7 rush-TD defense. The Jets absolutely rely on their rushing to score TDs (21 rush TDs, 12 pass TDs), and the Colts give up less than one rush TD per game. The Colts are more-than-competent putting the ball in the end zone on the ground, but rely far more heavily on passing (16 rush TDs, 34 pass TDs).

Oh, and by the way: 2 of those 11 rushing TDs allowed by the Jets were scored by the Colts - in barely one half of the game.

Advantage: Colts.

Pass Scoring

The Colts are #1 in pass-TD offense (34), while the Jets are #1 in pass-TD defense (8). The Jets are #29 in pass-TD offense (12), while the Colts are #10 in pass-TD defense (19). The Jets can't stop the Colts' passing offense; they can only hope to contain it. The Colts will get both yards and scores on the Jets' defense. On the other hand, the Colts can absolutely sell out the pass to stop the run, leaving their secondary one-on-one against the Jets receivers, because Sanchez has not proven himself at all to be any kind of deep threat.

Advantage: Colts.

Momentum?

First, on the matter of "momentum" (a concept that the Divisional Round of the 2009 playoffs squarely disproved), the Jets have won 7 of their past 8. Sounds impressive, right? Not so fast. First, the Jets preceded that stretch with a three-game losing streak, to Miami, Jacksonville, and New England. Then, their 7-of-8 streak consisted of a loss (at home) to Atlanta, and wins against Carolina, Buffalo, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Cincinnati, and San Diego.

Carolina, Tampa Bay, and Buffalo were a combined 16-31. The Colts were winning 15-10 (and getting the ball back) in the third quarter when they benched their starters in a game in which they had nothing to play for to begin with. The Bengals not only had little to play for in the season finale, but were also clearly in a bit of a slide from their mid-season peak (and were also dealing with the dual tragedies of the deaths of DC Zimmer's wife and WR Chris Henry). The Chargers proved themselves to be the most over-rated "hot" team in the playoffs. (Of San Diego's 11 consecutive wins, 8 were against teams with .500 or worse records: KC, OAK, NYG, DEN, KC, CLE, TEN, WAS.)

That 7-of-8 win stretch proves very little about the caliber of team the Jets are, or how they will play against the Colts.

Speaking of how the Jets will play against the Colts, let's review that Week 16 Jets-Colts game, shall we?

Jets' 29-15 Week 16 Win

First, the Jets were fighting for their playoff lives, and the Colts had absolutely nothing to play for (with respect to their goal of winning the Super Bowl - I couldn't care less about the perfect-season furor). The Jets came out with their season on the line (and played like it), and the Colts came out with a keep-the-offense-sharp-and-stay-healthy game plan (and played like it). The Colts played as vanilla as they can get, and the Jets blitzed as if it were going out of style. Oh, yeah: and the Colts, already playing short-handed (on offense, no Charlie Johnson at LT or Pierre Garcon at WR; on defense, no Jerraud Powers at CB, no Clint Session at LB, and both Freeney and Mathis on pitch-counts at DE), benched their starters early in the third quarter.

Colts Starters vs. Jets Starters

So, what was the outcome of first-string Colts versus first-string Jets? As 18to88 have also pointed out, both teams had six possessions with the first-stringers on the field. The Colts offense ammassed 296 yards and 15 points, gaining 13 first downs in 42 plays. The Colts defense held the jets to 141 yards and 3 points (not including the kick return for TD to start the second half), limiting them to 8 first downs in 33 plays. The Colts also allowed no turnovers.

Colts Offensive Starters vs. Jets Starters

Yards: 296, Points: 15
Plays: 42, 1st Downs: 13, Drives: 6, Scores: 3 (50%), 3-and-out: 0 (0%)
Yards Per Drive: 49.6, Points Per Drive: 2.5, First Downs Per Drive: 2.2

Colts Devensive Starters vs. Jets Starters

Yards: 141, Points: 3
Plays: 33, 1st Downs: 8, Drives: 6, Scores: 1 (16.7%), 3-and-out: 3 (50%)
Yards Per Drive: 23.5, Points Per Drive: 0.5, First Downs Per Drive: 1.3

Manning, who was 14 of 21 for 192 yards in only six series, led the Colts on scoring drives of 54, 86, and 81 yards. The Jets had one scoring drive of 63 yards.

Oh, and as for the Colts' supposed lack of a running game: in those same six series, Addai was 6 for 40 (6.7ypc) with one touchdown, and Brown (who struggled early) was 5 for 20 (4ypc) and a TD on the final series with the first-string offense.

Colts Reserves vs. Jets Starters

Once the Manning-led offense left the game, the Colts went nowhere and did nothing - except for surrendering a fumble that was recovered for a Jets defensive TD.

With the Colts second-stringers going against the Jets first-stringers: The Colts offense managed 42 yards and 0 points, gaining no first downs in 17 plays. The Colts defense surrendered 145 yards and 11 points (1 FG, 1 TD), allowing 7 first downs in 29 plays. The Colts gave up two turnovers (one fumble returned for a touchdown, and one interception).

Colts Offensive Reserves vs. Jets Starters

Yards: 42, Points: 0
Plays: 17, 1st Downs: 0, Drives: 6, Scores: 0 (0%), 3-and-out: 3 (50%)
Yards Per Drive: 7, Points Per Drive: 0, First Downs Per Drive: 0

Colts Devensive Reserves vs. Jets Starters

Yards: 145, Points: 10
Plays: 29, 1st Downs: 7, Drives: 4, Scores: 2 (50%), 3-and-out: 0 (0%)
Yards Per Drive: 36.3, Points Per Drive: 2.5, First Downs Per Drive: 1.8

Compare and Contrast

Colts Offense vs. Jets: Week 16 Overall

Yards: 277, Points: 15
Plays: 58, 1st Downs: 18, Drives: 12, Scores: 3 (25%), 3-and-out: 3 (25%)

Colts Offensive Starters vs. Jets Starters: Full-Game Extrapolation*

Yards: 493, Points: 26.3
Plays: 70, 1st Downs: 21.7, Drives: 10, Scores: 5 (50%), 3-and-out: 0

In an extrapolated game, the Colts would gain almost twice as many yards, and score almost twice as many points.

Colts Defense vs. Jets: Week 16 Overall

Yards: 293, Points: 29
Plays: 65, 1st Downs: 17, Drives: 10, Scores: 3 (30%), 3-and-out: 3 (30%)

Colts Defensive Starters vs. Jets Starters: Full-Game Extrapolation*

Yards: 235, Points: 5
Plays: 55, 1st Downs: 13.3, Drives: 10, Scores: 2 (20%), 3-and-out: 5

In an extrapolated game, the Colts would hold the Jets to about 20% fewer yards (Jets yardage was likely skewed lower than expected by the two turnovers surrendered by the Colts' second-unit offense, as well as much better starting field position in general after the starters were benched), and about 80% fewer points (not too difficult to imagine, since half of the Jets' points came off of special teams and defense).

So, in an extrapolated game:

  • The Colts offense would amass almost 500 yards and 22 first downs, scoring 5 times in 10 drives. Given that the Colts actually scored 2 TDs and 1 FG, it is reasonable to assume that those 5 scores would be either 2 TDs and 3 FGs or 3 TDs and 2 FGs - for a scoring range of 23 - 27 points.
  • The Colts defense would hold the Jets to 235 yards, 13 first downs, and 2 scores in 10 drives. Given that the Jets actually scored 1 FG against the Colts starters, it is reasonable to assume that those 2 scores would either be 2 FGs or 1 TD and 1 FG - for a scoring range of 6 - 10 points.

* Note: for purposes of extrapolation, the following assumptions were made:

  1. Each team is assumed to have a total of 10 drives
  2. The Colts' two touchdowns were assumed to be 7 points, so as not to compound missed PATs in the extrapolation. In other words, it is assumed that the Colts would make successive PATs. The two added points (blocked PAT and failed two-point conversion) were then deducted from the calculated total.
Uncharacteristic Special Teams Play

The game was also uncharacteristic with respect to special teams. The Colts surrendered a blocked PAT, which led them to attempt a failed two-point conversion following their second TD. The Jets also managed a kick return for touchdown, and were successful on two-point conversion attempts on two of their touchdowns.

Interestingly, the Colts yielded exactly one kick return for touchdown and exactly one defensive touchdown on the season: both took place in this game. In every other game, the Colts gave up neither a return touchdown nor a fumble/interception return touchdown. Thus, both in this game were clearly atypical, and likely due to the personnel decisions in the game. (My suspicion is that an already depleted special teams unit came out deflated to start the second half, after the team was nformed at halftime that the starters would be benched after one series each - which resulted in the opening kick being returned for the TD.)

Disregard the uncharacteristic special teams play, and the starters likely would have left the Week 16 game with a 17-3 lead - which may have been enough, even considering the kitchen sink that the Jets threw at Curtis Painter after Manning sat down, since the second-string defense only gave up 11 points.

What Week 16 Means for AFCCG Match-Up

Overall, there is nothing about that game that gives me any concern whatsoever regarding how the Colts can and should perform in the AFC Championship game. Just extrapolating from the previous game (which, again, isn't entirely analogous, given the Colts players that didn't play at all in that game, and the Colts' vanilla game plan), assuming both teams would have had 10 offensive possessions (and even allowing for the aberrant kick-return for touchdown, the blocked PAT, and the two-point conversion attempts by both teams), the Colts would have won that game by an approximate score of 26-13.

Take away the uncharacteristic special-teams play, and the Colts would have won that game by an approximate score of 27-6.

And that's still not accounting for the vanilla game plan and the inactive starters.

With all due respect to pundits such as Bob Kravitz, who admonishes Colts fans to be careful what we wish for - I'm absolutely licking my chops to be getting what I've wished for: a road to the Super Bowl that includes a bye, and home games against both wild card teams; an AFC Championship game against a team that the Colts match up very well against and that is suddenly getting over-hyped.

Prediction

Can the Colts lose? Of course. If they come out Sunday and fail to execute in all three phases, they absolutely can lose.

Should the Colts lose? Not a chance.

This game is the Colts' to win or lose. I would love to see them repay the Jets for their 41-0 drubbing of the Colts in the 2002 playoffs - and I think they're capable of it. But I'm just going to predict, based on the last game, that the Colts will win by roughly the same score that they likely would have had in the Week 16 matchup if the starters had played the whole game:

Colts win: 27-6

Phil B. Colts Chat Shout-Out To Mom

Filed in PersonalTags: Colts, Family, Indiana, Indianapolis, NFL

This one is for my Mom, who is at St. Vincent's Hospital in Indianapolis, recovering from a minor heart attack and having a stent put in.

In tonight's Colts Chat, hosted weekly by Indy Star Colts beat reporter Phil B., Mom got a shout-out and love from my fellow Colts fans:

Phil B. Colts Chat Poll Question for Mom

Phil B. Colts Chat Poll Question for Mom

Thanks, Phil B., and Colts fans. We appreciate your love and support! Colts fans are good people!