Category: Personal

Per·son·al: of, pertaining to, or coming as from a particular person; individual; private; Concerning a particular person and his or her private business, interests, or activities; intimate. Posts in this category pertain to things happening in my personal life.

  • Hostage Crisis in the ‘Ville

    Lots of excitement in the hometown this week:

    After a standoff lasting nearly 20 hours, a hostage situation was brought to a sudden conclusion at Bigfoot Food Store, 2905 E. State Road 44…

    The lengthy episode began at 10:30 a.m. Wednesday when [Dennis ] McAninch became involved in a high-speed chase with police officers that began in Batesville.

    McAninch crashed his car at the intersection of Interstate 74 and State Road 44, fired shots at officers who were pursuing him, then entered the Bigfoot Food Store and gas station and took the hostage.

    Can’t tell you how many times I got gas and drinks at that Bigfoot growing up. (And I’ve always thought of that rock out front as somewhat of a landmark; it’s rather an oddity – and potentially saved a teenager’s life that morning.)

    Some follow-up on the story: the hostage-taker’s death is being ruled a suicide, and the hostage talks about her ordeal.

    Indy Star coverage here, here, here, here, here, here, and here

  • Vote: No Confidence

    The Rose-Hulman faculty pass a resolution of no-confidence in President Jack Midgley, 82-47.

    By a vote of 87-42, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology faculty passed a resolution saying they have no confidence in President Jack Midgley.

    The vote, which occurred by secret ballot, came during a special faculty meeting Tuesday that lasted more than two hours.

    By all accounts, not good news:

    Right after the meeting, Grigg went to Midgley’s office to inform him. He also planned to contact representatives of the board of trustees.

    Asked if he believed the vote would carry a lot of weight with trustees, Grigg said, “It would be very hard to imagine otherwise.”

    However, as the article notes, the faculty are merely advisory, and the vote is not binding on the Board of Trustees. The initial response from the Board may be essentially a non-comment, or it could be indicative of the weight the Board will place on the vote:

    Board of trustee chairman Clyde Willian issued a statement through Dave Piker, vice president for public relations.

    “President Midgley has assured the board of trustees that he is absolutely committed to working with the faculty to resolve the concerns that are being discussed,” Willian said. “The board is fully aware of the issues presented by the faculty and others.

    Based on prevailing sentiment, the result of the vote does not surprise; however, the overwhelming outcome is enlightening. A vote of no-confidence is no trivial matter. For nearly two-thirds of the faculty to vote in favor indicates just how deep the rift has been driven.

    I hope Dr. Midgley can recover and repair the obvious wounds created on campus. I truly believe the vision he has shared with the alumni with respect to the future ofRose-Hulman is positive. Perhaps it is not yet too late. But a no-confidence vote affirmed by two-thirds of the faculty sends a very loud, very clear signal.

    UPDATE: Coverage from the Indy Star. Interesting note at the end of the article:

    Votes of no confidence on university leaders are unusual, but some presidents do survive them. In October 2002, the majority of the faculty of Indiana State University voted against President Lloyd Benjamin after a two-year tenure. The board took no action and he remains president.

  • Congratulatins, Eric

    The Shelbyville News announces the engagement of Michelle Copple and Eric Haehl. Eric went to high school with me, and graduated a year ahead of me.

  • Critical Crossroads?

    The Terre Haute Tribune Star reports on the on-going controversy surrounding Rose-Hulman President Jack Midgley:

    Normally, the tight-knit Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology community tries to settle its differences and controversies in-house and out of the public eye.

    These aren’t normal times, however.

    Many faculty, staff, students and alumni are frustrated and angered that the board of trustees is not addressing long-simmering concerns about Rose-Hulman President Jack Midgley, who has held the post since July 1.

    I still have yet to hear any real evidence of anything Midgley has done. Several hot-button issues have been brought up, including: Ventures, the Homework Hotline, and the departure of several Vice Presidents since Midgley’s arrival. Still, I’ve yet to see much real, hard evidence, besides “intimidation” and “threats”. Several times I’ve heard or read that Midgley has “lied”, or “said one thing to one person, and the opposite thing to another,” but I have yet to hear of a specific instance of either allegation.

    Take, for instance, the Homework Hotline. A picture caption in the Trib Star article reads as follows:

    Hard facts: Mike Lindley a Rose-Human senior from Robinson, Ill., states his case for saving the Homework Hotline during a rally Friday calling for the removal of Rose President Jack Midgley. Some fear the Homework Hotline may be in jeopardy.

    “Some fear…”? Taking a look over on AboutMidgley.com sheds some light about these “fears”. According to Institute meeting minutes (available on-campus only), the current grant for the Homework Hotline will end June 2005. During this meeting, a report was given that the school was in discussion with tutor.com to transition the Homework Hotline to tutor.com, and also that a propasal was to be prepared for a transition grant through a Lilly endowment to cover an additional year for the Homework hotline.

    So, without getting into the merits of the plan, it seems that Dr. Midgley is trying to find a way to preserve the Homework Hotline beyond its current grant, and yet his detractors count it against him.

    Speaking of the aboutmidgley.com web site: the Trib Star references the site forum (in fact, the article quotes my post on the forum, as well as a follow-up phone interview by the author, Sue Loughlin, who contacted me through my post on the forum). However, this same forum, that positions itself ostensibly as “a conversation about our president” with the following criteria stated:

    This site hopes to provide the following:

    • A public forum to allow us to discuss Midgley and his actions (anonymously if desired)
    • News articles relating to Midgley and our campus

    The site, however, will not provide the following:

    • A means for simply bashing Midgley (any discussion topics must be of intellectual value)
    • An unfair picture of Midgley (post your positive experiences as well)

    Hit The Road, Jack T-ShirtYet this same site, with this stated purpose, both unequivocably supports an online petition to ouster Midgley, and blatantly sponsors anti-Midgley rhetoric, as with this rally in support of a faculty meeting to hold a no-confidence vote – going so far as to sell “Hit The Road, Jack” T-Shirts directly from the web site. While the web site may have been started with objectivity in mind, it no longer maintains any credibility in that regard.

    Back to the article: without any apparent evidence of deleterious changes made by Midgley, the focus is instead on the more abstract “way he treats people” and questions of character. However, no specific instances are referenced, and the rhetoric among the “Hit The Road, Jack” crowd has elevated to hysteria:

    1993 Rose-Hulman graduate and current Ventures employee Brian C.] Dougherty further says that Midgley “is destroying Rose-Hulman at a pace that I would have never believed attainable ? Rose-Hulman has suffered damage to its reputation that will take 20 years to repair.”

    Rose-Hulman is “at a critical crossroads,” [Assistant Dean of Faculty Dan Moore] said. If Midgley stays on as president, “I don’t think the 2015 conversation [about the college’s future] will be relevant. We’ll be lucky to still be operating.”

    [Former Board of Trustees member Scott A. Jones] resigned from the board in mid-February “because I could not get other trustees to listen to my concerns or to take any reasonable action to save Rose-Hulman from Midgley before it is too late.”

    Jones believes “the future of Rose-Hulman is at stake.”

    Even should the allegations prove to be all true, Rose-Hulman has survived disastrous administrations before, and it will do so again in the future. I certainly understand and appreciate the passionate concern for the Institute; I share that same concern. But so far, I still believe this issue is really a matter of conjecture, rumor, change-resistance/post-Hulbert fear that have all blown out of any reasonable proportion.

  • Congratulations Ish and Pritee

    This weekend I was in Kansas City for the marriage of Pritee Phool to Ishwinder Chattha. Both are Sikh, and this marriage was arranged between Ish, of Indian descent, and Pritee, native of Thailand.

    BharaatPHOTO: Ish with his mother at the Bharaat.

    The festivities began Friday evening with the Bharaat reception at the Doubletree hotel in downtown Kansas City. Ish was attired and prepared at his family’s house (in a ceremony called the Sehra Bandi) before he, family, and friends arrived at the Bharaat, led by fanfare and music. The bride’s family organizes the Bharaat as the formal greeting of the groom’s family. The bride’s family provides lots of food, singing, dancing, and other entertainment after greeting the groom with the traditional garlands.

    The wedding ceremony itself – the Anand Karaj – took place at the Gurudwara (Sikh Temple) in Kansas City.

    Anand KarajPHOTO:Ish and Pritee during Anand Karaj

    Most of the ceremony – the name of which means “Ceremony of Bliss” – was conducted in Panjabi, and the celebrants and guests sat on the floor as is customary. Immediately following the ceremony, the traditional temple lunch took place. This meal – the Langar – is served in the temple Langar hall, and consists of vegetarian cuisine served to everyone sitting on the floor, as equals.

    And the picture you’ve all been waiting to see:

    TurbanPHOTO: Traditional Indian garb with Punjab turban

    Ish provided me with a traditional Indian outfit to wear during the Anand Karaj. Also, Sikh tradition requires, along with the removal of shoes before entering the temple, that everyone cover the head during prayers or when entering the temple. So, Ish’s brother-in-law was kind enough to provide me with a traditional Punjab-style turban.

    Following Langar, the married couple greeted family and friends outside the Gurudwara.

    Ish and PriteePHOTO:Ish and Pritee after the Anand Karaj

    During the weekend, as my friend noted, we were impressed with just how much the Sikh wedding is not just the joining of a husband and wife, but the union of two families.

    The wedding reception followed that evening at Club 1000 in downtown Kansas City. More traditional food, along with more entertainment, speeches, dancing, and a cake-cutting ceremony were all part of the celebration.

    Congratulations, Ish and Pritee, and thank you for the opportunity to share this experience with you and your families.

    (Temporary: original Haloscan Comments – Comments)

  • Web Site New Forum To Discuss Rose President

    Apparently Dr. Midgley is “controversial” enough to warrant a website dedicated to discussing him:

    A Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology student has developed a Web site that provides a forum for discussion about the college’s controversial new president, Jack Midgley.

    www.AboutMidgley.com is not part of the college’s Web site.

    Personally, I’m sick of it already. All the rumor-mongering and chcken littles acting like Midgley is the end of Rose-Hulman. To be fair, anybody would be the end of Rose-Hulman as we knew it under Sammy. As with any outstanding administrator, no replacement could hope to replicate him – then again, nor should any replacement want to, or even want to try. The Midgley administration needs to be the Midgley administration, not the Hulbert administration redux.

    Here’s my first post on the forum:

    From my experiences with Dr. Midgley, I think he is a great addition to Rose-Hulman. Dr. Midgley is not Sam Hulbert; he never will be – nor will anyone else. Thus, his style of administration will not be the same as Hulbert’s.

    Being on the outside, having graduated five years ago, and therefore not having quite the same emotional attachment as current students and faculty, I can say from my perspective that Dr. Midgley will be positive.

    His business acumen and vision for the Institute are much-needed in a world in which the nature of post-secondary education will be facing drastic change in the near future.

    Personally, I applaud his action to remove the “We’re #1” banners; I never liked them – they seemed to me to be too much like boasting. I much prefer the focus to be on where we are going, not where we are, or where we have been. Would we rather revel in our past accomplishments as #1, proclaiming that status proudly to the world, or work diligently to continue to set the standard for undergraduate engineering education, confident in knowing we are Number 1, whether or not we plaster it across campus?

    Change is inevitable in the real world. In every instance of change, there are some who will embrace it from the onset, some who will hesitate, some who will come along after some time and convincing, and some who will resist change at all costs. Rose-Hulman is right now going through this process. Those who will always resist any change are right now making the most noise.

    Call me one of the early-adopters. Whether with Dr. Midgley or his successor, change will happen. Personally, I think the change Dr. Midgley brings is good for Rose-Hulman.

    (Temporary: original Haloscan Comments – Comments)

  • I Like Your Pants

    And whoever said Terre Haute, IN, isn’t exciting? Aaron Baldauff recounts a recent late-night excursion to the Terre Haute Kroger, beginning as follows:

    On a scale from 1 to inappropriate, leaving Kroger this evening lands at right about 74.

    Way too funny, but completely apropos to The Haute.

  • On This Date

    Happy Anniversary, Mom and Dad! (Sept. 8, 1973)

  • Pigeonhole, Work In Progress

    The only thing in common
    is that we’re not the same.
    Yet the only difference is
    that I like it that way

    You may say I’m patient,
    but all I’m waiting for is you
    to realize that the sum
    is greater than the whole.

    Maybe I should have held back
    and not opened up quite so soon.
    But please don’t judge me on
    just what you read that afternoon.

    Please don’t put me in a pigeonhole;
    different doesn’t mean incompatible.

  • I Kissed Dating Goodbye

    When I was in college, someone loaned me a book to help me with my struggles concerning dating relationships – and, in particular, my lack thereof. That book, I Kissed Dating Goodbye (IKDG), was written by then-twenty-one-year-old Joshua Harris, who implored young people to pursue God-centered relationships, and to “redeem the time” while they are single (thanking God for the gift of singleness that He gives us).

    Well, when I read it back then, I thought, “This book makes some sense. But, since I’ve never really been one to play the dating ‘game’, he’s not really speaking to me. When I say I want a relationship, I want to pursue the possibility of marriage.”

    What I completely missed, though, were two very important concepts – waiting on the right timing, and making the most of my time as a single man. As I reflected on my relationship with Erica, I remembered reading that book, and knew that I needed to give it another read – this time, with a completely changed point-of-view. I can look back now and realize that I spent most of my high school and college years unappreciateve of – and often, despising – my singleness, rather than seeing it for the gift that singleness is. Now, I made quite a bit out of my time, and managed to keep following God’s plan for my life, even despite of myself; however, I threw away many opportunities I had during that time – opportunities to grow closer in my walk with Christ, and to serve my sisters in Christ in love (too often, I served them with ulterior motives – in trying to subtly “woo”, I gave up much of the joy and learning I could have experienced).

    In part, I was patient; “I’m still in college;” I would say, “if I’m not dating now, I guess that’s okay, because, really, school is my first priority.” At the same time, had the chance presented itself, I know I would have dated, even while in college.

    But that mindset turned on me when I got out of college. Barely five months after graduating, Erica and I started dating. What I came to realize though, upon reflection, is that I did not take nearly enough time getting to know her, as her friend, before building mental and emotional intimacy – which certainly led us the wrong way in terms of the direction of physical intimacy. Had I taken the time to get to know her, I probably would never have pursued her as a girlfriend – see, Erica is a great, wonderful girl, and friend, but since she is not a Christian, I know I could never marry her. Before we started dating, I knew that she went to a Lutheran university, and that she regularly attended church there and at home, and I made a big mistake – I assumed. Five or six months into the relationship – long after I had already grown mentally and emotionally attached to her – Erica revealed to me that she was not a Christian – that she had many unanswered questions about life, and religion, and that she went to church, in part, to try to help answer those questions.

    It took God months to work in my heart enough for me to do the right thing – in some cases, using tearful realizations of who I had become in the past few years, and especially in the past few months.

    So, where does that leave me now?

    For the first time in my life, I can honestly say that I am content being single – I know that I may struggle with patience, waiting on the right timing – God’s timing. I know that I may struggle at times, keeping my motives pure when I act in service and love toward my sisters in Christ. But I also know that I have the support of the Holy Spirit, my guide and teacher. I also know that I have the support, encouragement, and love of a very close group of friends – who will hold me accountable, and who will be there for me, even if I can’t be there for myself sometimes.

    I re-read IKDG, and Josh Harris’ words literally spoke to my heart from every page I read. Finally, I had the necessary perspective – no longer could I say naively, “That’s not me; that will never happen.” It had happened. Even worse, it almost happened again, less than a month after becoming single again. I likely will recount the details of that yet-developing story, but not now. Suffice it to say that, through the grace of God, and through the counsel of my friends – one in particular – I am learning how to handle things in a God-like, God-centered manner.

    While I will not be afraid of one-on-one situations with other women, I will not seek them out – especially if doing so has any motive other than absolutely pure, Christ-like love. I will seek first to develop friendships with my sisters – serving them, loving them, helping them to grow, and will expect nothing out of the relationship other than the knowledge I gain – through loving and serving them, I will learn how to love, and to serve, my future wife.

    At the same time, my own personal concern will be to fully redeem the time during this season of singleness – continuing to deepen my relationship with God, serving Him by serving those around me, and, most importantly, continuing to prepare myself for Him to work His Plan in my life. I will learn what it means to be a good husband and father, what it means to be able to support a family, and what it means to take the next step closer to fulfilling God’s Plan in my life. I know that God has given me a heart for people – and for missions, in particular; however, God also brought me through engineering school, and placed me in Kalamazoo, MI for this season of my life.

    Do I know, exactly, why God chose this route for my life? No, not yet. But I am trusting Him with all of my heart; I am purposing not to lean on my own understanding. I am once again trying to acknowledge Him in all of my ways – and I am trusting Him to direct my path.

    Q E D