- @JLeuze Mackinac Island, UP, Michigan? in reply to JLeuze #
- @Otto42 why should @vaultpress care? It's still just files + database. in reply to Otto42 #
- @carlhancock tweet away. I love Mexico! in reply to carlhancock #
- @JLeuze where does she want to visit? Most of my experience is in southern Mexico. I would avoid northern border right now. in reply to JLeuze #
- @JohnJamesJacoby I've used that email address convention for ten years now. What's the issue/concern/problem? in reply to JohnJamesJacoby #
- @Otto42 are you doing anything with the wp.org plugin repository? Submitted a plugin about two weeks ago but no response. Things backlogged? #
Category: Lifestream
Life·stream: a time-ordered stream of documents that functions as a diary of your electronic life, including the flow of personal information and exchange created by social network services. A daily digest of my various social networking activities, as collected by Lifestream.
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-15
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-14
- @andreasnrb looks like he stopped approving comments altogether. in reply to andreasnrb #
- @carlhancock the current "net neutrality" bill has *absolutely nothing* to do with net neutrality. It's just more government control. in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay the current "net neutrality" bill will not bring about the result that you want. in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @carlhancock read.the.bill. What the tech world wants in the principle of "net neutrality" is not what is in the bill. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay then why do you have a problem with the Tea Party protesting the Net Neutrality bill? in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay the Tea Party people only know of the bill, generally speaking. They're not protesting the principle. in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @carlhancock I don't want "premium content", personally. I just want bandwidth. But the market should decide supply/demand in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay what was the argument, and why was it off-base. I'm not exactly in the loop on this one. in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @carlhancock I agree – thus my belief that the market (private sector) should decide in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay the market has decided. A cable company could offer a la carte, but it would be cost-prohibitive, so they don't in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @carlhancock the NN and TP camps are talking about two different things entirely. In principle, they probably actually agree in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay cable companies are content providers, not creators. The content creators set the price, which they discount (cont) in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay by bundling content. Cable companies could pay for a la carte content, and pass cost to consumers (cont) in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock (cont) but consumers would not pay the cost for a la carte programming. Thus, the creator-provider-consumer market has decided in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock providers can't provide a la carte, because creators make providers purchase bundles, through discounted pricing in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @carlhancock indeed: the content that can bring in sufficient a la carte income (i.e. enough market demand) is provided thusly. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay @carlhancock the NFL Network dispute is the perfect example of the dynamics involved in this issue. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay but are you willing to pay what it would cost to get just that handful of channels? in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay that's because the other 94 channels *subsidize* the channels you do watch. They would cost *far* more a la carte in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay the question is: do you support content creators' right to set the price for their content, based on the market? in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay b/c your stance sounds like you want govt to force creators to sell you their content for the price *you* want in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay and I know you're too much of a free-market believer to take such a stance in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock but they did eventually adopt to market demands (despite their specious attempts to claim piracy was impacting their business) in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock but there's no similar market demand in the TV market yet. Cable/sat customers are happier with $ than CD customers were in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay you're having a tough time @ replying me today, eh? :p in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock @onefinejay likewise! in reply to carlhancock #
- Remember Nina Gershon's asinine Bill of Attainder ruling re: Congress & ACORN funding? http://bit.ly/dllYH1 OVERTURNED: http://bit.ly/8WWI8G #
- @bradleypotter that's exactly what I do. In style.css I import master.css, comments.css, plugins.css, print.css, etc. in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter I didn't want co clutter the <head>, and assume a (slight) performance hit for multiple <links> vs @import in style.css in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter but I'm considering moving everything but master (and maybe even that) into style.css natively in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter but it makes it harder to maintain modular CSS (e.g. icons.css for link icons) in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter but the main reason I don't place all in <head> is to facilitate parent/child theme CSS overrides. in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter I'm doing it this way right now for ease of understanding parent-theme CSS, for child-theming (cont) in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter (cont) if a super-fast child theme is desired, it can leave out the parent-theme style.css @import & put all in own style.css in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter and with that I'll stop tweet-spamming you 🙂 in reply to bradleypotter #
- @bradleypotter quite true. And bear in mind: I'm currently developing for specific use case (new Theme devs), not necessarily for efficiency in reply to bradleypotter #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-13
- @RaheemBrock as in, to the Titans? If so, congrats – at least you'll be reunited with several former #Colts players! 😉 in reply to RaheemBrock #
- @ryancduff I believe Marco Rubio had some choice words for ol' Dingy Harry, over that bit of racial demagoguery. in reply to ryancduff #
- @ryancduff indeed, provided that Sharron Angle can run a decently competent campaign, he should be gone in November. in reply to ryancduff #
- @bradellsworth given your chances of winning in November, I'd say those t-shirts are *very* limited edition. in reply to bradellsworth #
- @philgood50 way to lay the wood last night. Keep those WRs honest! #
- @bradleypotter don't tease me like that in reply to bradleypotter #
- Just found out that a church member's infantry unit lost a soldier to an IED while on foot patrol in Afghanistan. #
- @Skitzzo of course, that's what wpblogger is for, right? He's almost got me incensed enough to start drafting my own post. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @carlhancock the issue isn't GPL compliance, but rather ideological conformity. in reply to carlhancock #
- @itsananderson that's my anniversary, so: Happy Anniversary! 🙂 in reply to itsananderson #
- @caffeinatedb sad, but increasingly true in reply to caffeinatedb #
- @OneFineJay I met plenty of unsophisticated neighbors in Maryland, too in reply to OneFineJay #
- You stay classy, liberals: http://bit.ly/bHbVvr p.s. you'll have to wait until November for our response. #
- @Skitzzo well, you know what Forrest Gump's mother says: petty is as petty does! in reply to Skitzzo #
- @andreasnrb I can corroborate that he has made the hate-speech accusation against @skitzzo in reply to andreasnrb #
- @Skitzzo I'm just refraining from even trying to comment on that post. I think the post itself was in poor taste & I won't add to it. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @Ipstenu I assume he's also suing the current administration for funding mosques – you know, as the equal-opportunity athiest he is? in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu yep, everything old is new again. It was stupid then, just as it's stupid now. But then I was never one for peer pressure. 🙂 in reply to Ipstenu #
- Poor Marc Bulger: preseason & he's already getting pummeled, only now it's behind the Ravens' 2nd-string OLine instead of Rams' 1st string #
- Jimmy Clausen has completed 4 passes over the middle of the field & these announcers are acting like he's the 2nd coming of Roger Staubach #
- @Ipstenu project runway: ugh. Come watch it with my wife; I'm going to bed to get out of watching it. 🙂 in reply to Ipstenu #
- @andrea_r I bet you guys have a *great* view of Perseid, eh? in reply to andrea_r #
- The last 3 plays in this game: interception w/a penalty on the runback, fumble recovery returned for a TD & a missed PAT. Preseason NFL FTW! #
- @williamsba so does Ed Reed. in reply to williamsba #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-12
- @themelab @skitzzo that's an irrelevant question, especially when Automattic markets wp.com to such users. in reply to themelab #
- @themelab @skitzzo and especially since @photomatt has made it clear that this is a personal, rather than a business, decision in reply to themelab #
- @Skitzzo @themelab nontrivial numbers of people are disgruntled enough to consider leaving wp.com. Read posts/comments: http://bit.ly/cMR8I2 in reply to Skitzzo #
- @Skitzzo I'm having a hard time seeing his positive focus. I'm blinded by the FUD in his most recent blog post. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @mvandemar yes, and I've been doing some additional research. I will have a follow-up soon, I promise! in reply to mvandemar #
- @Skitzzo how about "sycophantic echo chamber"? in reply to Skitzzo #
- @GrantGriffiths @mattonomics indeed, you don't want also to be accused of doing the "bare minimum", after all. in reply to GrantGriffiths #
- @mattonomics I truly didn't want to believe it but he leaves little choice; only believes in "freedom" for those ideologically aligned w/him in reply to mattonomics #
- @GrantGriffiths law, pshaw. The SFLC have spoken! in reply to GrantGriffiths #
- @Skitzzo I'm all for child themes. Of course, I don't see anything other than a semantic difference between a child theme and a skin. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @franky that reminds me, I need to go check in on the bleating… in reply to franky #
- @photomatt @carlhancock @wptavern @themelab BS. Why lie? p.s. users don't agree w/teh awesome: http://bit.ly/cwpxqq http://bit.ly/cMR8I2 in reply to photomatt #
- Anyone unhappy with capricious @wordpressdotcom decisions (Cutline/Coraline): I'll help you move to self-hosted. @wpturnkey for free help. #
- @photomatt @carlhancock @wptavern @themelab what was the rush? Why did the kill switch need to be thrown before full testing? in reply to photomatt #
- @carlhancock @photomatt or simply update Cutline, and take it over for your purposes. It was GPL after all, right? in reply to carlhancock #
- @andreasnrb rather an Obama-esque shakedown, that. in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb Matt implying that Chris should give WPF money, just like Obama demanded $20B from BP. Perhaps a Sopranos/mob reference instead? in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb no argument there – but there was no legal basis for the pre-emptive $20B shakedown. Just like Matt pandering for WPF donation in reply to andreasnrb #
- @photomatt @carlhancock I have no problem whatsoever with Coraline. New, awesome themes are great. Screwing your wp.com customers isn't. in reply to photomatt #
- @photomatt are Headway doing only the "bare minimum" to support GPL also? Should @GrantGriffiths be worried that he'll be next? in reply to photomatt #
- @carlhancock @photomatt needless perpetuation is all this is. Why not do a proper phase-out? Why title your post "Syn (ie "sin")-Thesis"? in reply to carlhancock #
- @bgardner @skitzzo "100% GPL" *is* a hurdle when it is conflated with conformance to GPL. Community ethos? Fair enough. Legally required? No in reply to bgardner #
- @lorelleonwp use Linux? 😀 in reply to lorelleonwp #
- @bgardner and that's cool and all – he just needs to drop the perpetuation of animosity toward those who don't. It's unhealthy in reply to bgardner #
- @GrantGriffiths great post! http://bit.ly/bxLQAQ in reply to GrantGriffiths #
- @GrantGriffiths just left a comment in reply to GrantGriffiths #
- Seriously, @topchefbravo: Kenny? Amanda can't grill strip steak, and you send the 2nd best contestant home? Gotta have your drama, I guess. #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-11
- @woothemes thanks for these! Much needed, and gorgeous GPL web icons: http://bit.ly/dc4Rhb cc:@flashingcursor #
- @OneFineJay I rather prefer a democratic process to the dictatorship proposed by @owillis in reply to OneFineJay #
- @janeforshort I should hope not! isn't that essentially academic indulgences (or, bribery)? in reply to janeforshort #
- @owillis a legislative bill being passed with no input/intervention by the minority party is dictatorial, not democratic cc:@onefinejay in reply to owillis #
- @owillis "majority" != "absolute power". But thanks for the demonstration of liberalism's true colors. cc:@onefinejay in reply to owillis #
- @owillis reciprocity? Where did GOP ever do what you're asking for? p.s. minority voice isn't "taint" (more liberal hubris) cc:@onefinejay in reply to owillis #
- @OneFineJay shocked? not at all. Like I said: liberalism's true colors (absolute, statist power; democracy is a hindrance) in reply to OneFineJay #
- @owillis but not without input/influence from the then-minority Dems. That's the key point. in reply to owillis #
- @Ipstenu strippers didn't kill 3,000 Americans in the name of stripperism, and then build a strip club in the ruins of the WTC to taunt us in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu that's the truth! (Though, I still have issues w/Bad Behavior and OpenID playing nicely together.) in reply to Ipstenu #
- @ewerickson does Handel have a chance of pulling it out? in reply to ewerickson #
- @ewerickson and the Republican primary has 35K more votes than the Dem primary in reply to ewerickson #
- @Skitzzo not a bit of it surprises me in reply to Skitzzo #
- @carlhancock we have them all over the house here. Get some glue pads. They work great. in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @skitzzo who here believed that? Anyone? Beuller? Beuller…? in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock @skitzzo and will be ultimately detrimental to the community in reply to carlhancock #
- @Skitzzo you lost me at "benevolent" in reply to Skitzzo #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-07
- @themelab is @ianb running a WP 3.1 nightly (i.e. unstable), or does he mean WP 3.0.1? Also, WP can't patch itself against poor host configs in reply to themelab #
- @CaseySoftware I think you mean "double-plus-ungood" in reply to CaseySoftware #
- @Ipstenu @andrea_r that's my oldest daughter as well: she looks just like me, except that she's pretty (which she clearly gets from her mom) in reply to Ipstenu #
- @DeFries but it's still a non-trivial difference between a stable bug release (3.0.1) and a use-at-your-own-risk nightly build (3.1) in reply to DeFries #
- @andrea_r that's *never* something a child should say to a parent… 😀 in reply to andrea_r #
- @Ipstenu I'm shocked you had to say that in the first place, much less repeat yourself and elaborate. (Strike that: not shocked; saddened) in reply to Ipstenu #
- @18to88 we're heading into town this evening, to go to the fair tomorrow. in reply to 18to88 #
- @OneFineJay Minnesotans don't have a "midwest" accent; they have a *Minnesota* accent. See central IN and southern IL for *midwest* accent. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @kimparsell @OneFineJay indeed: central OH, too! My wife's Cincinnati accent, and the St. Louis locals' accent, however, are something else in reply to kimparsell #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-06
- @themelab great list! p.s. @nettuts – the Theme Unit Test data WXR file has been updated (significantly). See wp.org for the most recent rev in reply to themelab #
- @OneFineJay Such crowd-sourcing is inherently flawed. Need I scour Alternet for a similar excoriation of the libs who use the same tactics? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @nacin Lindsey Graham is a fool. Please don't hang that moron on the whole party. Jus soli is morally right. Anti-14th will have no legs. in reply to nacin #
- @nacin I think it's pandering, because he knows he's in trouble. But he's clearly misunderstanding the issue. in reply to nacin #
- @nacin and that's the truth. There are many in the establishment that aren't happy that we (the little people) are trying to clean house in reply to nacin #
- @nacin McConnell, Sessions, Kyl, and McCain are mentioned as a "thumbs up" for the idea. RINOs all. Will be happy to see them go. in reply to nacin #
- Middle Class America: Senate Democrats just voted to raise your taxes: http://bit.ly/9aQTol (and Missouri noticed *your* vote, @ClaireCMC) #
- Hey Dick Lugar and Lindsey Graham: do us all a favor and switch parties. It will save us all time and money in your next Senate primary. #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-05
- @conorpegypt I debunked this one months ago: http://bit.ly/bvPB4f bottom line: such studies define/measure "quality" of Health care wrong in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt to demonstrate the point: how many from US go to AUS/CAN/GER/NETH/NZ/UK for medical treatment? How many of them come to US? in reply to conorpegypt #
- @andreasnrb as a parent, I believe that's *my* responsibility. That would be a parenting #fail more than a school system #fail in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb I've seen that before, but it's only intermittent for me. Find any related Trac tickets? in reply to andreasnrb #
- @GrantGriffiths I'm late to the party, but here you go anyway: I have 34 active plugins. in reply to GrantGriffiths #
- @caffeinatedb for sure – especially since they are publicly funded. in reply to caffeinatedb #
- @caffeinatedb and we had swimming classes, too (freshman year for me) – but I knew how to swim long before then in reply to caffeinatedb #
- @OneFineJay (as usual) I'm with you. That whole argument has been framed entirely incorrectly. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @conorpegypt (feel free to have a go; I'm thick-skinned 😉 ). I've experienced several other countries, but not health care per se. in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt but then, I don't argue from anecdote, so I'm not sure such experience is relevant or necessary. in reply to conorpegypt #
- @ryancduff thanks! Just doing our part. in reply to ryancduff #
- @conorpegypt if you're unemployed, you get free coverage through the government, via Medicaid. in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt in the U.S., no hospital can turn you away. If you show up, you get treated. in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt indeed, it isn't. But it works for us. Americans value personal freedom and choice over (government) security, any day. in reply to conorpegypt #
- @ryancduff and note: we were outspent 4:1 in advertising. (I say "we" only in the sense that I supported Prop C. I wasn't directly involved) in reply to ryancduff #
- @conorpegypt argument? Nah… just a discussion. 😉 in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt not surprising. I grew up in "flyover country", in a farm community where most had never left the state, much less country. in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt wanderlust is not part of the ethos for a great deal of the US Midwest, rather "work hard, take care of home and family" in reply to conorpegypt #
- @conorpegypt on the other hand, I love to travel. 🙂 in reply to conorpegypt #
- @Ed4Congress congrats on your primary win! Methinks Pelosi-lapdog Russ will have plenty of time to sail on his tax-avoiding yacht after Nov! in reply to Ed4Congress #
- @MarkReardonKMOX all eyes were on Prop C. I don't think MO State Auditor primary is a referendum on Tea Party endorsements. in reply to MarkReardonKMOX #
- @OneFineJay I think the primaries are *the* place to voice intra-party dissent: ideology in the primary, party in the general. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay indeed. Look at the Michigan GOP primary for governor. Time for runoffs (or caucuses)? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay UT is safe GOP (TP cand. Mike Lee 58%/28%). Do you mean NV? (TP cand Sharron Angle w/in MOE vs. Harry Reid) in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay GOP primaries were all uncontested in Utah in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay and I can't find any current polling to indicate state of the 3 UT house races? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay can't find such a state. Here's the RCP House map: http://bit.ly/9BaW32 any ideas? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @andrea_r @kimparsell @wptavern 2nd day in a row projected 102 degrees, index up to 112 here in St. Louis. I'll trade any of you 🙂 in reply to andrea_r #
- @OneFineJay no worries. Maybe it was just a transient poll result? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @Ipstenu if only she were, you know, qualified. (The same reason, coincidentally, that I opposed W's nomination of Harriet Miers.) in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu wrt "qualified": yes. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu Prop 8 doesn't prevent marriage. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu indeed – and all men and women are equally able to marry, under Prop 8. Prop 8 doesn't deny the right of marriage. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu what about a man and 2 women? Should they be able to marry? Where does "due process" end and propriety begin? in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu possibly. The family is so fundamental to health of society that *society* has the right to define it to its benefit… in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu i.e. between one man and one woman. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu nope. Each of them can still marry. Each can marry a man. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu and I believe that point is not mere semantics. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu I love you the same regardless of sexual orientation. 🙂 in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu understandable. I support your right to choose/live your lifestyle, just not the right to redefine marriage. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu 140char limit applies here. I believe the dismantling of traditional family to be the single most destructive impact on society in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu but the gay marriage issue is a small fraction of that. Hetero men/women who divorce/don't marry are by far more impactful in reply to Ipstenu #
- @OneFineJay I've always held that marriage is a religious – not State – institution. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @andreasnrb send some my way, please! in reply to andreasnrb #
- @Ipstenu we share an adherence to Genesis, right? That's where I believe marriage is defined as the joining of one man and one woman in reply to Ipstenu #
- @Ipstenu I could write volumes, just based on my own experiences with my family, my wife, her family, and our children. in reply to Ipstenu #
- @nathanrice @OneFineJay agreed. The Federal Judiciary continues to overstep its authority. It *will* have repercussions eventually. in reply to nathanrice #
- @andreasnrb aaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!! Just what I need. 103 degrees (40C to you) on my drive home this afternoon. in reply to andreasnrb #
- @OneFineJay believe it or not, I think I'm cool with that. I believe in equal protection under the State. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @andreasnrb add in the heat index (humidity factor) and it felt like 45C. in reply to andreasnrb #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-04
- 4:50am – time to head to the polls. Everyone in #StLouis come out and vote today! ('Yes' on Prop C. Reject ObamaCare!) #
- @ewerickson I was a poll supervisor in a very Democrat-heavy part of St. Louis county. Prop C won even in my precinct. in reply to ewerickson #
- @andreasnrb it's going no farther in Missouri. The Show-Me state is showing ObamaCare the door. Prop C to reject it currently up 75%-25%. in reply to andreasnrb #
- @Hamlin4Congress congratulations on your primary win today! #
- @whennessy I just finished a 17-hour day. Coming home to the thus-far Prop C results is making my night! in reply to whennessy #
- @DanStlMo 330,000 vote margin, with 78% reporting. in reply to DanStlMo #
- @24thstate even St. Louis Co voted in FAVOR of Prop C: 61%-39%. STL City only contributed a4,000 vote margin against a 355K margin in favor in reply to 24thstate #
-
Twitter Updates for 2010-08-03
- @andreasnrb !important is the tool of the devil. Any CSS that requires it is poorly written CSS. in reply to andreasnrb #
- @DanStlMo vote? Heck, I'm supervising! in reply to DanStlMo #
- Game ON! Hughes signed! \via @Adam_Schefter …The #Colts and first-round pick Jerry Hughes agreed to a five-year contract. More at espn.com #
- @pwilson24 I love Wayne, but he needs to put some ice on it. Play better in the Super Bowl, and maybe we can talk. in reply to pwilson24 #
- @pwilson24 totally expected, but no less welcome. Best news of the day! With Sanders/Gonzo not on PUP also, it's Christmas in August. in reply to pwilson24 #
- @pwilson24 right now, I'm sticking with "both practiced this morning and looked decent" fullstop. But you know me: the eternal optimist! 🙂 in reply to pwilson24 #
- @williamsba have you talked with @andreasnrb? You guys might be able to collaborate in the affiliate space. in reply to williamsba #
- @OneFineJay dude, you're en fuego today in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay indeed. Couldn't care less about Bieber, but your Meghan McCain stuff is cracking me up. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @pwilson24 right now, it's *all* upside. Defending AFC champs, healthier than we've been since XLI, promising young talent… in reply to pwilson24 #
- @pwilson24 Sanders and Gonzo are icing on the cake. Their absence didn't cost us the SB; Freeney and Powers' injuries did. So, I'm pumped! in reply to pwilson24 #
- Just got off the roof, taking the satellite dish apart. I don't remember "putting my life at risk" being part of my SatTV contract. #