Author: Chip Bennett

  • Well, At Least They Admit It…

    Editor and Publisher reports that the St. Louis Post-Dispatch will remain “Liberal” under new owner Lee Enterprises:

    When Lee Enterprises Inc. agreed to purchase Pulitzer Inc. for $1.46 billion, it also agreed that the flagship St. Louis Post-Dispatch will keep its longstanding liberal editorial slant for at least the next five years, according to the purchase agreement mailed to Pulitzer shareholders Friday.

    Well that’s comforting; wouldn’t want the Compost-Disgrace to become, you know, balancecd or anything…

  • United Blogs of America?

    Rebecca MacKinnon asks an interesting question in her post on global blogging, with respect to the lack of global content among the mostly American blogosphere:

    Why don’t American bloggers link very much to bloggers around the world? People in the room suggested there are 2 main reasons: One reason is that they don’t know where to find the good blogs from other countries – unless Instapundit or somebody has linked to them. Another reason is that people don’t have enough context or knowledge about events going on in foreign countries to blog about them.

    Both explanations are plausible, but let me add a third: Sphere of Concern versus Sphere of Influence.

    A huge part of the rise of the blog phenomenon – from the “A-List” to the Tail – at the expense of the MSM is the frustration of literally millions of individuals who recognize the blatantly biased, one-sided, agenda-driven product that for too long has been passed off ostensibly as “news”. As has been detailed in such books as Blog and South Park Conservatives, this disparity led to the rise of Conservative talk radio (pioneered by Rush Limbaugh, and followed by many), the FOX news network, and most recently, the mostly Conservative internet explosion known as the blogosphere. I won’t re-hash that history here; I only mention it as background.

    The blogosphere is a unique addition to this rise of “New Media”. It is the modern incarnation of the combination of the power of Gutenberg’s printing press with the influence of Martin Luther’s ideas. While few bloggers fancy themselves neo-Lutheran in their ability to influence the masses and subvert the controlling authorities in the process, most appreciate their role in participating in that foundational tenet of a free society: the free-flow of information and ideas.

    So what’s my point? Just this: American bloggers tend to focus their work on American issues because it is those issues over which they may – individually for some, and corporately for the rest of us – exert some level of influence. While American bloggers may – and, I would guess, most do (take, for example, Gateway Pundit) – have in their Sphere of Concern global issues, they recognize that such issues are far-removed from their Sphere of Influence.

    Again, the reason that the blogosphere experienced such explosive growth – primarily among Conservatives – is that would-be bloggers recognized blogging as a means to counter-balance the MSM; in other words, the intent of blogging is to exert influence (no matter how minimal that influence may be for anyone not named Glenn Reynolds). It is logical to assume that most bloggers believe their influence could be exerted most effectively with respect to America-centric issues. Coincidentally, the first showdown between “old” and “new” media took place during the most recent American Presidential election cycle.

    If this explanation holds true, then as the blogosphere matures, it will attempt to exert its influence not just in American issues, but in increasingly global issues. (Cases in point: the Darfur crisis and the UN Oil-For-Food scandal.) However, I would go even farther: the MSM focus on several global issues only because those issues are first introduced, investigated, and discussed in the blogosphere.

  • Currently On The Coffee Table

    South Park Conservatives: The Revot Against Liberal Media Bias: Brian Anderson


    Letters to a Young Conservative: Dinesh D’Souza

  • Christian Carnival LXIX: Semicolon

    Christian Carnival LXIX has arrived, hosted this week by Semicolon:

    Welcome to the Christian Carnival and to Semicolon. I pray that you will be edified, educated, and encouraged as I was in reading and thinking through ALL sixty of the entries for this week. Yes, I read them all. Have fun as we blog through Ephesians 6.

  • Geo Test

    Just Testing…

  • Operation: Matador

    Lots of news throughout the ‘sphere detailing Operation Matador:

    Belmont Club’s coverage:
    Battle on the Syrian Border
    Hearts and Minds
    The Fourth Rail’s coverage:
    Bringing It On
    The Matador’s Sword
    Foreign Elements
    Grist For The Mill
    Roundup from Winds of Change
    The Adventures of Chester:
    Live Blogging Marine Operations on Syrian Border
    Snap Reactions
    Matador Updates
    Narrative Summary and Map
    Noon Wednesday Updates
    One Hand Clapping:
    Big Operation Underway in Iraq

    DOD News Briefing Transcript

  • More Planned Parenthood Stupidity

    Another post from Evangelical Outpost, this time concerning a Planned Parenthood spokeswoman both lying through her teeth, and uttering sheer idiocy:

    In the latest edition of Planned Parenthood’s webzine choice! magazine, a reader asks Dr. Vanessa Cullins to resolve a dispute about whether life begins at conception or when “a baby takes its first breath.” Dr. Cullins, an obstetrician/gynecologist and vice president for medical affairs at PPFA, responds:

    All kinds of people — theologians, philosophers, scientists, lawyers, legislators, and many others — hold very different views about when life begins. In fact, both the egg and the sperm are living things before they meet and join. There’s no real argument there. The really hot question is, “When does being a person begin?” Most medical authorities and Planned Parenthood agree that it starts when a baby takes its first breath.

    EO does a fine job discussing the moral irrelevance (and intellectual dishonesty) of such a statement; however, I was struck by its sheer stupidity.

    To be clear, the act of breathing involves pulmonary function – that is, the transfer of oxygen through the lungs into the bloodstream. This oxygen is introduced to the lungs via respiration: breathing. Now, everyone knows that humans breathe air. However, as the PP spokeswoman fails to point out, humans breathe air only after the expulsion of the placenta from the uterus during childbirth. Prior to this act, respiration occurs inside the placenta, and the unborn child respirates the amniotic fluid it contains. Thus, the point that this woman attempts to make – that “human” being begins at the point of “first breath”, and “first breath” occurs at childbirth, ergo “human” being begins at childbirth – is an utter fallacy. In truth, pulmonary function in unborn children begins about four weeks after fertilization.

    If Planned Parenthood were intellectually honest and consistent, no abortions would thus be performed beyond the fourth week of pregnancy.

  • On Plausibility Structures

    Evangelical Outpost has a good primer on plausibility structures, especially with respect to Intelligent Design versus naturalism:

    Everything that we believe is filtered through our plausibility structure – a belief-forming apparatus that acts as a gatekeeper, letting in evidence that is matched against what we already consider to be possible… Plausibility structures can prevent us from forming beliefs that are inconsistent with experience and evidence. But they can also have a negative impact, preventing us from forming true beliefs about reality. This appears to be the case within a broad segment of modern science. By accepting a plausibility structure that is limited to purely naturalistic explanations, many in the scientific community have imposed self-limiting and irrational criteria for explaining reality.

    The truly ironic thing is, Evolutionists cannot seem to recognize their assumption that the mere introduction of Intelligent Design into the study of Origins would require them to delve into the religious and moral implications of such an introduction. One of the points made here, with reference to the work of Stephen Mayer, is that science is perfectly capable of exploring Intelligent Design completely removed from any such implication.

  • Research, Advertisement, or Ethical Statement?

    Really interesting little tid-bit from the world of academia:

    If you don’t like getting your paper rejected before it even reaches peer review, ask David Egilman how to get around the process: In what may be an unprecedented move, when the Brown University researcher’s paper was recently rejected from an occupational medicine journal, he simply bought two pages of ad space and printed the entire article in the same journal.

    The article brings up some potentially thought-provoking questions concerning ties between researchers and their sponsors in industry, but doesn’t really try to make a case either way. Of course, combined with other recent reports of researcher unpropriety, people might start asking questions…

  • Words of Wisdom

    Good advice for bloggers from RightWingNews. My personal favorite:

    17) Even if you only have 7 people reading, work like you have 7000 readers. Because if you don’t work hard when you have almost no readers, you’re never going to get to 7000