2011Tue11Jan

Twitter Updates for 2011-01-11

Permalink | Shortlink | Comments (0) | Trackback | PrintFiled in Lifestream

Loughner stalked Giffords since at least 2007 (i.e. well before @SarahPalinUSA was a household name) http://bit.ly/h1NPhD #
@donncha indeed. Normally I'd say give him the needle, but I don't know if this guy is even mentally competent to stand trial. in reply to donncha #
@davecoveney I won't lose sleep over it, if he's found to be mentally capable to stand trial. This guy is the epitome of evil. in reply to davecoveney #
@davecoveney perhaps, but then I'm still imperfect. We've discussed my struggles with the death penalty, but if anyone deserves it, he does in reply to davecoveney #
@davecoveney forgiveness != elimination of all consequences for one's actions. AZ has death penalty. Jury of peers will decide. in reply to davecoveney #
@OneFineJay I want libs to explain how tea party and @SarahPalinUSA incited Loughner to start stalking Giffords way back in 2007? in reply to OneFineJay #
@SarahPalinSux why the shouting? And what if we all act like adults and understand that metaphorical speech != inciting to violence? in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@OneFineJay why her target, and not DNC's target or DailyKos' target? Truth is: the voices in his own head incited him to violence. in reply to OneFineJay #
@SarahPalinSux and, am I expected to believe you desire civil discourse, considering the ad hominem inherent in your screen name? in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@OneFineJay yes. The 1st reaction by the left was to blame the right. 2nd was to start pushing gun control and restriction of free speech in reply to OneFineJay #
@bgardner I don't suppose the article mentions her declining to do another season? Spin FTW! in reply to bgardner #
@SarahPalinSux drum beat? He was stalking her long before Palin/tea party existed. Why would a psycho liberal care what Palin says anyway? in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux irrelevant, cherry-picked data don't help your argument that Palin incited Loughner, a psycho liberal, to violence in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux violent? Not appropriate. But not all gun metaphors are inherently violent. See eg Peyton Manning's "laser rocket arm". in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux and to say Loughner isn't your argument is disingenuous. You responded to my statement that Palin isn't responsible for him. in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@kenny I've had that request before. Funny thing is, K-Meleon is mostly standards-compliant so standards-based Themes already look mostly ok in reply to kenny #
@SarahPalinSux first order of business: prove link between *specific* rhetoric and *specific* violence. Thus far, link remains unproven. in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux "violence-inciting rhetoric": a premise that is an unproven assumption. Loughner acted out of his own psychosis, not rhetoric in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux "Known Facts" are still assumptions that must be proven. Also, non-sequitur and ad hominem still don't help your argument in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux thanks for proving your hypocrisy. You just proved that you have no desire to "tone down" rhetoric. in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux by the way, if you want to avoid Presidential assassinations, look out for left-wing anarchists/Marxists - like Loughner in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux rhetoric knows know ideology, but if any is "violence-inducing" it is from the left: http://bit.ly/fToWqI in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux I present evidence. What do you have? in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux @BenGoldey @SarahPalinUSA there's nothing violent about "rhetoric" regarding removing someone from office in an election. in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux and nice of you to remove my link from that RT. I understand; it refuted your narrative. in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux I know you liberals just utterly despise the 2nd Amendment. BTW: Enjoy more liberal hypocrisy: http://bit.ly/hSRtbb in reply to SarahPalinSux #
@SarahPalinSux and you continue to prove your hypocrisy. Well done! in reply to SarahPalinSux #