- @18to88 @indystar_colts @indystar_sports and they *look* fake, too. Besides: won't the *teams themselves* dictate their uniforms? in reply to 18to88 #
- @OneFineJay how about simply, "Rule of Law"? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @carlhancock they're merely directing *offensive* possessions toward one end zone. Other EZ used to receive kickoffs & (presumably) Def TDs in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @RobAlloyIV it would circumvent existing immigration laws. Also, what of Equal Protection when taxpayer $ goes to illegals? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @OneFineJay @RobAlloyIV I agree. It's true, but pointless to argue *motive* rather than (valid) *consequences*. in reply to OneFineJay #
- @feckitorg niiiiiice! in reply to feckitorg #
- @RobAlloyIV @OneFineJay interesting you should mention that point, given the recent history of various amnesty efforts – by both parties. in reply to RobAlloyIV #
- @nacin why does is_front_page() return true if the front page is set to display posts? Causes front-page.php to override home.php. #
- @markjaquith "[bladders] contain an undetermined amount of liquid" also. Perhaps TSA should ban them, as well. in reply to markjaquith #
- @Skitzzo not to mention, it's anti-semite in reply to Skitzzo #
- @nacin correct. But in so doing, it overrides (ergo, obsoletes) home.php, because front-page.php will always take precedence. Intended? #
- @Skitzzo "[Circumcision] is up to the choice of the individual — not the parents, society or religion." Wanna bet he's also pro-abortion? #
- @JohnPBloch @markjaquith and in my case, uric acid and ketone bodies – which I'm sure will soon be added to TSA's list. in reply to JohnPBloch #
- @andreasnrb @Skitzzo are you not familiar with Judaism? See Genesis 17, covenant of circumcision: http://bit.ly/c0Et3r in reply to andreasnrb #
- @nacin I emailed wp-hackers, inquiring if this was intended behavior. I can see a use case for separate home.php and front-page.php. in reply to nacin #
- @andreasnrb straw man. Male circumcision provides actual benefits. Female circumcision is simply abuse. Removing choad != removing clitoris in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb "no proven benefits" is patently, demonstrably false. Circumcision = recuced infection, disease transmittance, cancer, etc in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb what (documented) risk? And, no, they don't. Not until they're adults. See: piercings, tattoos, etc. – require parental consent in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb you're saying the risk of a simple procedure (that's been done for 4,000 years) outweighs risk of infection, HIV, cancer, etc? in reply to andreasnrb #
- @carlhancock @andreasnrb out of curiosity, where do both of you stand on abortion? in reply to carlhancock #
- @yoast @wptavern I would prefer that WPWeekly and the WPCommunity podcasts remain separate. They are VERY different, and I like both. in reply to yoast #
- @andreasnrb sorry my friend, but you just lost all credibility on this argument. A foreskin is more important to you than an unborn child? in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb seriously, a foreskin is a moral right, but an unborn child is a "parasite"? I think I'm going to back out of this conversation. in reply to andreasnrb #
- @wptavern do what you think is right. The form is more "tavern" like, anyway, so I think the change will work out just fine! in reply to wptavern #
- @carlhancock @andreasnrb I would support abortion in one very narrow scope only: if the life of the mother is in imminent danger. in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock I think you underestimate the emotional distress – to both the child AND the mother – of murdering an innocent child in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock besides, the child is innocent & did nothing to deserve a death sentence, regardless how heinous the crime against the mother in reply to carlhancock #
- @carlhancock fair enough! cc: @andreasnrb in reply to carlhancock #
- @andreasnrb actually, not so much. Pro-life is pro-life, although I admit to having no sympathy for execution of rapists/murderers in reply to andreasnrb #
- @carlhancock @andreasnrb not as ironic as pro-abortionists being anti-death sentence. Killing innocent babies = OK. Killing murderers = BAD? in reply to carlhancock #
- @andreasnrb @carlhancock again: which is the bigger double standard, pro-abort, anti-death penalty, or anti-abort, pro-death-penalty? in reply to andreasnrb #
- @andreasnrb but I agree with @carlhancock: let's go back to solving #WordPress problems! We'll never find common ground here. in reply to carlhancock #
- @OneFineJay @technosailor meh. I prefer brunettes – primarily, my wife! in reply to OneFineJay #
- @wjdennen that one went over my head. 🙂 in reply to wjdennen #
- @wptavern @carlhancock in which case, you'd still own the wptavern domain, and could revert to posting there. in reply to wptavern #
- @BlogForBooks I'm signed up, and getting emails, but can't login; website says my email address not found in system. Help!?! #