- @Skitzzo long story. 1) Wasn't an attempted rip-off; was an homage. No intent or implication of portrayal as "official" site. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @Skitzzo 2) of all the people to go after for copyright/trademark violation – including sites setup exclusively for security exploitation… in reply to Skitzzo #
- @Skitzzo …(cont) *that* was the site called out? 3) the response to such criticism was way over-the-top and melodramatic. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @Skitzzo 4) after all was said and done, rather than accept criticism for an editorial post, he just deleted it & the comments in reply to Skitzzo #
- @Skitzzo that about covers it, I think. in reply to Skitzzo #
- @kimparsell Thesis getting pulled into that comment thread: like I said, complete non-sequitur. Makes no sense. in reply to kimparsell #
- @OneFineJay @kimparsell I can't even really figure out what point she was trying to make, except maybe it's the GPL-code-is-$-free misnomer? in reply to OneFineJay #
- @DWcourse argh! I've got wp_debug set to 'true' for Theme Review testing purposes… thanks for letting me know! in reply to DWcourse #